Navalyze · Container · Ship

LUEBECK

IMO: 9216092
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 8,410 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 19.70 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: PERCY SHIPPING CO.

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,342 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

342

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

146

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

10.9 kn

Fuel per day at sea

89.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,510 t

CO₂ emitted

55,094 t

Distance sailed

51,240 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,708 h

196 days, 54% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 74.1 kg/nm · median 177 (−58%)

78.8Ranks 159 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 10.5 kn · median 13.3 (−21%)

9.1Faster than 18% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 28.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+72%)

7.22Ranks 1,636 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports17%
From the EU3%
Into the EU4%
At berth in the EU76%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

41,982 t

76.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LUEBECK
Container median

0.0100.0200.0300.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LUEBECK
Container median

10.011.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

LUEBECK
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−9%	−8%	−11%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.3 kn	−1%	−12%	+16%	−29%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	+2%	−4%	−18%	+43%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	−13%	−15%	+11%	−29%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.9 kn	−73%	−68%	−13%	–	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 73%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.3 kn	+270%	+260%	−8%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile up 270%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.8 kn	+10%	+18%	+49%	+3%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	PERCY SHIPPING CO.	3,106	9,862	41,907	3,987	10.5	74.1	28.0	94%
2024	PERCY SHIPPING CO.	3,817	11,924	46,891	4,488	10.4	81.4	29.2	95%
2023	not published	3,335	10,417	40,518	3,466	11.7	82.3	41.0	–
2022	not published	3,970	12,427	49,200	3,960	12.4	80.7	28.6	–
2021	not published	4,112	12,852	44,401	3,476	12.8	92.6	40.1	–
2020	not published	17,510	55,094	51,240	4,708	10.9	342	146	–
2019	not published	5,136	16,050	55,597	4,964	11.2	92.4	37.1	–
2018	not published	3,125	9,757	37,225	3,575	10.4	83.9	35.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	PERCY SHIPPING CO.	28.0	16.3	+72%	1,636 of 2,208	ABS	B
2024	PERCY SHIPPING CO.	29.2	17.5	+66%	1,437 of 1,974	ABS	B
2023	not published	41.0	19.4	+111%	1,550 of 1,899	Lloyd's Register	B
2022	not published	28.6	19.1	+50%	1,263 of 1,825	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	40.1	17.9	+124%	1,487 of 1,781	Lloyd's Register	B
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	B
2019	not published	37.1	18.9	+96%	1,379 of 1,788	DNV	B
2018	not published	35.8	20.2	+77%	1,269 of 1,705	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.