Navalyze · Container · Ship

EGY CROWN

IMO: 9216107
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 11,643 t
Port of registry: Alexandria
Technical efficiency: EEXI 19.34 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: JORK VALIANT

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: AKKAD SHIPPING (AK SHIPS)

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 11,643 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

90.8 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−49%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

24.48

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+50%)

Average speed

7.2 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−46%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

617 t

CO₂ emitted

1,934 t

1,965 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

6,786 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

943 h

39 days, 11% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 90.8 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−49%)

78.8Ranks 413 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 7.2 kn · median 13.3 (−46%)

9.1Faster than 4% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 24.48 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+50%)

7.22Ranks 1,539 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU47%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU4%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,005 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

EGY CROWN
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EGY CROWN
Container median

5.07.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EGY CROWN
Container median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−6.3 kn	+41%	−25%	−70%	−6%	6.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 41%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.6 kn	−15%	−12%	−26%	−3%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.5 kn	−11%	−25%	−18%	−16%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+3.1 kn	−19%	+1%	+133%	−17%	3.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.2 kn	+8%	−9%	+180%	−1%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.4 kn	+25%	+38%	−93%	−14%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 25%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	+0%	−0%	−12%	−22%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	AKKAD SHIPPING (AK SHIPS)	617	1,934	6,786	943	7.2	90.8	24.48	–
2024	AKKAD SHIPPING (AK SHIPS)	1,461	4,579	22,652	1,679	13.5	64.5	26.04	85%
2023	not published	2,326	7,283	30,497	2,357	12.9	76.2	26.82	–
2022	not published	3,199	10,114	37,283	2,427	15.4	85.8	32.03	–
2021	not published	1,703	5,383	16,012	1,305	12.3	106.4	38.59	–
2020	not published	563	1,779	5,714	394	14.5	98.6	38.88	–
2019	not published	6,052	18,860	76,868	5,868	13.1	78.7	45.25	–
2018	not published	6,854	21,359	87,433	6,606	13.2	78.4	57.89	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	AKKAD SHIPPING (AK SHIPS)	24.48	16.30	+50%	1,539 of 2,208	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2024	AKKAD SHIPPING (AK SHIPS)	26.04	17.52	+49%	1,360 of 1,974	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2023	not published	26.82	19.40	+38%	1,253 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	32.03	19.13	+67%	1,340 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	38.59	17.90	+116%	1,462 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	38.88	17.58	+121%	1,466 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	45.25	18.88	+140%	1,495 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	57.89	20.22	+186%	1,558 of 1,705	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.