Navalyze · Container · Ship

EGY CROWN

IMO: 9216107
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 11,643 t
Flag (estimated): Egypt
Port of registry: Alexandria
Technical efficiency: EEXI 19.34 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: JORK VALIANT

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: AKKAD SHIPPING (AK SHIPS)

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,469 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

85.8

Container median 178 kg/nm (−52%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

32.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (+67%)

Average speed

15.4 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

31.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,199 t

CO₂ emitted

10,114 t

Distance sailed

37,283 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,427 h

101 days, 28% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 90.8 kg/nm · median 177 (−49%)

78.8Ranks 413 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 7.2 kn · median 13.3 (−46%)

9.1Faster than 4% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 24.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+50%)

7.22Ranks 1,539 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports50%
From the EU21%
Into the EU16%
At berth in the EU14%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,424 t

14.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EGY CROWN
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EGY CROWN
Container median

5.07.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EGY CROWN
Container median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−6.3 kn	+41%	−25%	−70%	−6%	6.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 41%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.6 kn	−15%	−12%	−26%	−3%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.5 kn	−11%	−25%	−18%	−16%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+3.1 kn	−19%	+1%	+133%	−17%	3.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.2 kn	+8%	−9%	+180%	−1%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.4 kn	+25%	+38%	−93%	−14%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 25%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	+0%	−0%	−12%	−22%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	AKKAD SHIPPING (AK SHIPS)	617	1,934	6,786	943	7.2	90.8	24.5	–
2024	AKKAD SHIPPING (AK SHIPS)	1,461	4,579	22,652	1,679	13.5	64.5	26.0	85%
2023	not published	2,326	7,283	30,497	2,357	12.9	76.2	26.8	–
2022	not published	3,199	10,114	37,283	2,427	15.4	85.8	32.0	–
2021	not published	1,703	5,383	16,012	1,305	12.3	106	38.6	–
2020	not published	563	1,779	5,714	394	14.5	98.6	38.9	–
2019	not published	6,052	18,860	76,868	5,868	13.1	78.7	45.3	–
2018	not published	6,854	21,359	87,433	6,606	13.2	78.4	57.9	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	AKKAD SHIPPING (AK SHIPS)	24.5	16.3	+50%	1,539 of 2,208	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2024	AKKAD SHIPPING (AK SHIPS)	26.0	17.5	+49%	1,360 of 1,974	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2023	not published	26.8	19.4	+38%	1,253 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	32.0	19.1	+67%	1,340 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	38.6	17.9	+116%	1,462 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	38.9	17.6	+121%	1,466 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	45.3	18.9	+140%	1,495 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	57.9	20.2	+186%	1,558 of 1,705	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.