Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

KARRUCA

IMO: 9216470
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 3,782 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: Istanbul
Technical efficiency: EIV 20.54 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SICHEM CROISIC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: BEYKIM DENIZCILIK GEMI ISLETMECILIGI SAN. VE TIC. A.S.

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,202 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

57.6

Chemical tanker median 81.9 kg/nm (−30%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

43.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.2 (+166%)

Average speed

7.1 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.2 kn (−37%)

Fuel per day at sea

9.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,922 t

CO₂ emitted

6,061 t

Distance sailed

33,369 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,725 h

197 days, 54% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 46.5 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−42%)

52.8Ranks 66 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 10.0 kn · median 11.1 (−10%)

8.8Faster than 23% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 38.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+159%)

7.93Ranks 1,299 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports35%
From the EU23%
Into the EU33%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

544 t

9.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

KARRUCA
Chemical tanker median

40.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

KARRUCA
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

KARRUCA
Chemical tanker median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.0 kn	−8%	+1%	+11%	–	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.9 kn	−12%	+12%	−4%	–	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−3.9 kn	−8%	−41%	−39%	+21%	3.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.3 kn	+12%	+26%	+37%	−34%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.4 kn	+3%	−10%	−12%	+13%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.2 kn	−19%	−9%	+8%	−39%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+3.1 kn	+19%	+73%	−7%	+56%	3.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	BEYKIM DENIZCILIK GEMI ISLETMECILIGI SAN. VE TIC. A.S.	1,657	5,245	35,620	3,574	10.0	46.5	38.9	–
2024	BEYKIM DENIZCILIK GEMI ISLETMECILIGI SAN. VE TIC. A.S.	1,624	5,101	31,955	3,531	9.0	50.8	–	–
2023	not published	1,922	6,061	33,369	4,725	7.1	57.6	43.2	–
2022	not published	3,434	10,846	54,710	4,990	11.0	62.8	35.6	–
2021	not published	2,245	7,168	39,969	4,115	9.7	56.2	53.5	–
2020	not published	2,477	7,862	45,265	4,088	11.1	54.7	47.4	–
2019	not published	2,811	8,832	41,789	4,238	9.9	67.3	77.4	–
2018	not published	2,538	7,980	44,942	6,651	6.8	56.5	49.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	BEYKIM DENIZCILIK GEMI ISLETMECILIGI SAN. VE TIC. A.S.	38.9	15.0	+159%	1,299 of 1,460	ClassNK	–
2024	BEYKIM DENIZCILIK GEMI ISLETMECILIGI SAN. VE TIC. A.S.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A
2023	not published	43.2	16.2	+166%	1,177 of 1,314	ClassNK	A
2022	not published	35.6	16.1	+122%	1,212 of 1,409	ClassNK	A
2021	not published	53.5	16.7	+221%	1,281 of 1,343	ClassNK	A
2020	not published	47.4	16.2	+194%	1,229 of 1,312	ClassNK	A
2019	not published	77.4	17.3	+347%	1,304 of 1,321	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	49.7	17.1	+190%	1,194 of 1,294	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.