Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

AK HALIMA

IMO: 9217826
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 18,178 t
Port of registry: Bridgetown
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.10 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: ALETHINI

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: AK GROUP CO. LTD

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 18,178 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

70.6 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−15%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.34

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+56%)

Average speed

9.5 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−11%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

818 t

CO₂ emitted

2,598 t

2,638 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

11,582 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,222 h

51 days, 14% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 70.6 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−15%)

61.0Ranks 906 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 9.5 kn · median 10.7 (−11%)

8.8Faster than 17% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.34 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+56%)

4.80Ranks 2,989 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports27%
From the EU50%
Into the EU14%
At berth in the EU8%

68% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,761 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

8.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

AK HALIMA
Bulk carrier median

40.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AK HALIMA
Bulk carrier median

9.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AK HALIMA
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.7 kn	+34%	+13%	−32%	+14%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 34%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.8 kn	−23%	−8%	−20%	−28%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 23%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	+31%	+22%	−41%	+33%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 31%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.4 kn	−4%	−17%	+229%	+1%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.2 kn	−9%	+1%	+128%	−4%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.8 kn	+6%	−2%	−89%	+10%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	−10%	−7%	+134%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	AK GROUP CO. LTD	818	2,598	11,582	1,222	9.5	70.6	12.34	–
2024	AK GROUP CO. LTD	900	2,850	17,093	1,524	11.2	52.7	10.83	–
2023	not published	1,474	4,651	21,455	2,291	9.4	68.7	15.00	–
2022	not published	1,913	6,073	36,504	3,631	10.1	52.4	11.26	–
2021	not published	608	1,897	11,105	969	11.5	54.7	11.11	–
2020	not published	294	925	4,864	472	10.3	60.4	11.56	–
2019	not published	2,505	7,856	43,989	3,961	11.1	56.9	10.54	–
2018	not published	1,188	3,746	18,776	1,738	10.8	63.3	11.32	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	AK GROUP CO. LTD	12.34	7.89	+56%	2,989 of 3,610	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2024	AK GROUP CO. LTD	10.83	8.09	+34%	2,301 of 3,089	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2023	not published	15.00	8.27	+81%	3,090 of 3,548	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	B
2022	not published	11.26	8.71	+29%	2,849 of 3,968	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	B
2021	not published	11.11	8.57	+30%	2,565 of 3,466	ClassNK	A
2020	not published	11.56	8.24	+40%	2,501 of 3,150	ClassNK	A
2019	not published	10.54	8.38	+26%	2,389 of 3,360	ClassNK	A
2018	not published	11.32	8.50	+33%	2,558 of 3,384	ClassNK	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.