Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

AK HALIMA

IMO: 9217826
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 18,178 t
Flag (estimated): Barbados
Port of registry: Bridgetown
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.10 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: ALETHINI

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: AK GROUP CO. LTD

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 14,451 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

68.7

Bulk carrier median 86.1 kg/nm (−20%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.27 (+81%)

Average speed

9.4 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.8 kn (−13%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,474 t

CO₂ emitted

4,651 t

Distance sailed

21,455 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,291 h

95 days, 26% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 70.6 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−15%)

61.0Ranks 906 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 9.5 kn · median 10.7 (−11%)

8.8Faster than 17% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+56%)

4.80Ranks 2,990 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU48%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

170 t

3.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AK HALIMA
Bulk carrier median

40.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AK HALIMA
Bulk carrier median

9.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AK HALIMA
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.7 kn	+34%	+13%	−32%	+14%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 34%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.8 kn	−23%	−8%	−20%	−28%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 23%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	+31%	+22%	−41%	+33%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 31%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.4 kn	−4%	−17%	+229%	+1%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.2 kn	−9%	+1%	+128%	−4%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.8 kn	+6%	−2%	−89%	+10%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	−10%	−7%	+134%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	AK GROUP CO. LTD	818	2,598	11,582	1,222	9.5	70.6	12.3	–
2024	AK GROUP CO. LTD	900	2,850	17,093	1,524	11.2	52.7	10.8	–
2023	not published	1,474	4,651	21,455	2,291	9.4	68.7	15.0	–
2022	not published	1,913	6,073	36,504	3,631	10.1	52.4	11.3	–
2021	not published	608	1,897	11,105	969	11.5	54.7	11.1	–
2020	not published	294	925	4,864	472	10.3	60.4	11.6	–
2019	not published	2,505	7,856	43,989	3,961	11.1	56.9	10.5	–
2018	not published	1,188	3,746	18,776	1,738	10.8	63.3	11.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	AK GROUP CO. LTD	12.3	7.90	+56%	2,990 of 3,611	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2024	AK GROUP CO. LTD	10.8	8.09	+34%	2,301 of 3,089	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2023	not published	15.0	8.27	+81%	3,090 of 3,548	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	B
2022	not published	11.3	8.71	+29%	2,849 of 3,968	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	B
2021	not published	11.1	8.57	+30%	2,565 of 3,466	ClassNK	A
2020	not published	11.6	8.24	+40%	2,501 of 3,150	ClassNK	A
2019	not published	10.5	8.38	+26%	2,389 of 3,360	ClassNK	A
2018	not published	11.3	8.50	+33%	2,558 of 3,384	ClassNK	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.