Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

APL HOLLAND

IMO
9218674
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
51,058 t
Port of registry
Singapore
Technical efficiency
EIV 21.01 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 51,058 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
225.8 kg/nm
Container median 174.4 kg/nm (+29%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
13.82
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.88 (−27%)
Average speed
15.5 kn
Container median 13.7 kn (+13%)
Fuel per day at sea
84.0 t/day
Fuel consumed
18,357 t
CO₂ emitted
57,364 t
Distance sailed
81,296 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
5,245 h
219 days, 60% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2019

Set against all 1,788 container ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 225.8 kg/nm · median 174.4 (+29%)
82.1Ranks 1,119 of 1,788, lowest first308.8
Average speedThis ship 15.5 kn · median 13.7 (+13%)
8.6Faster than 76% of container ships16.5
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.82 g CO₂/t·nm · median 18.88 (−27%)
7.86Ranks 560 of 1,788, lowest first55.28
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports6%
  • From the EU50%
  • Into the EU42%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
98%
2% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
2.2%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • APL HOLLAND
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • APL HOLLAND
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • APL HOLLAND
  • Container median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2018→2019−1.2 kn−9%−15%−8%−23%1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2019not published18,35757,36481,2965,24515.5225.813.8298%
2018not published21,75067,91888,0755,28216.7246.918.03–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2019not published13.8218.88−27%560 of 1,788ABSC
2018not published18.0320.22−11%731 of 1,705ABSC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

APL HOLLAND (IMO 9218674): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2019 | Navalyze