Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

KARLICA

IMO: 9220354
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 5,221 t
Port of registry: Istanbul
Technical efficiency: EIV 23.01 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super
Former names: TURCHESE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: BEYKIM DENIZCILIK GEMI ISLETMECILIGI SAN. VE TIC. A.S.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,221 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

57.6 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−28%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

34.88

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+132%)

Average speed

5.9 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−47%)

Fuel per day at sea

8.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,321 t

CO₂ emitted

4,173 t

4,238 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

22,914 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,860 h

161 days, 44% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 57.6 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−28%)

52.8Ranks 213 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 5.9 kn · median 11.1 (−47%)

8.8Faster than 2% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 34.88 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+132%)

7.93Ranks 1,234 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports41%
From the EU23%
Into the EU29%
At berth in the EU6%

72% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,014 t).

Fuel burned laden

57%

43% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

6.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

KARLICA
Chemical tanker median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

KARLICA
Chemical tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

KARLICA
Chemical tanker median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−2.2 kn	−6%	−31%	+41%	+13%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.8 kn	−9%	−26%	−43%	−6%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−9%	−9%	−22%	−23%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	−10%	−15%	+27%	+3%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.5 kn	+1%	−3%	−23%	−0%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.8 kn	−16%	+12%	−12%	+5%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.7 kn	+0%	+26%	+16%	−15%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	BEYKIM DENIZCILIK GEMI ISLETMECILIGI SAN. VE TIC. A.S.	1,321	4,173	22,914	3,860	5.9	57.6	34.88	57%
2024	BEYKIM DENIZCILIK GEMI ISLETMECILIGI SAN. VE TIC. A.S.	998	3,140	16,294	2,024	8.1	61.2	30.78	61%
2023	not published	1,911	6,006	28,508	2,878	9.9	67.0	32.60	–
2022	not published	2,675	8,439	36,474	3,660	10.0	73.3	42.53	62%
2021	not published	2,339	7,460	28,761	2,723	10.6	81.3	41.27	70%
2020	not published	2,979	9,496	37,160	3,360	11.1	80.2	41.43	–
2019	not published	4,044	12,958	42,221	5,095	8.3	95.8	39.60	–
2018	not published	3,487	11,179	36,479	5,500	6.6	95.6	46.77	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	BEYKIM DENIZCILIK GEMI ISLETMECILIGI SAN. VE TIC. A.S.	34.88	15.04	+132%	1,234 of 1,460	ClassNK	–
2024	BEYKIM DENIZCILIK GEMI ISLETMECILIGI SAN. VE TIC. A.S.	30.78	16.73	+84%	1,001 of 1,274	ClassNK	A
2023	not published	32.60	16.23	+101%	1,062 of 1,314	ClassNK	A
2022	not published	42.53	16.06	+165%	1,291 of 1,409	ClassNK	A
2021	not published	41.27	16.69	+147%	1,210 of 1,343	ClassNK	A
2020	not published	41.43	16.16	+156%	1,183 of 1,312	RINA	B
2019	not published	39.60	17.32	+129%	1,156 of 1,321	RINA	B
2018	not published	46.77	17.14	+173%	1,180 of 1,294	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.