Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

KARLICA

IMO: 9220354
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 5,221 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: Istanbul
Technical efficiency: EIV 23.01 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super
Former names: TURCHESE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: BEYKIM DENIZCILIK GEMI ISLETMECILIGI SAN. VE TIC. A.S.

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,285 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

81.3

Chemical tanker median 83.0 kg/nm (−2%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

41.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.7 (+147%)

Average speed

10.6 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.2 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

20.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,339 t

CO₂ emitted

7,460 t

Distance sailed

28,761 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,723 h

113 days, 31% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 57.6 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−28%)

52.8Ranks 213 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 5.9 kn · median 11.1 (−47%)

8.8Faster than 2% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 34.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+132%)

7.93Ranks 1,234 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports45%
From the EU24%
Into the EU29%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

1,642 t

70% of all fuel; 30% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

201 t

2.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

KARLICA
Chemical tanker median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

KARLICA
Chemical tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

KARLICA
Chemical tanker median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.2 kn	−6%	−31%	+41%	+13%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.8 kn	−9%	−26%	−43%	−6%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−9%	−9%	−22%	−23%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	−10%	−15%	+27%	+3%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.5 kn	+1%	−3%	−23%	−0%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.8 kn	−16%	+12%	−12%	+5%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.7 kn	+0%	+26%	+16%	−15%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	BEYKIM DENIZCILIK GEMI ISLETMECILIGI SAN. VE TIC. A.S.	1,321	4,173	22,914	3,860	5.9	57.6	34.9	57%
2024	BEYKIM DENIZCILIK GEMI ISLETMECILIGI SAN. VE TIC. A.S.	998	3,140	16,294	2,024	8.1	61.2	30.8	61%
2023	not published	1,911	6,006	28,508	2,878	9.9	67.0	32.6	–
2022	not published	2,675	8,439	36,474	3,660	10.0	73.3	42.5	62%
2021	not published	2,339	7,460	28,761	2,723	10.6	81.3	41.3	70%
2020	not published	2,979	9,496	37,160	3,360	11.1	80.2	41.4	–
2019	not published	4,044	12,958	42,221	5,095	8.3	95.8	39.6	–
2018	not published	3,487	11,179	36,479	5,500	6.6	95.6	46.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	BEYKIM DENIZCILIK GEMI ISLETMECILIGI SAN. VE TIC. A.S.	34.9	15.0	+132%	1,234 of 1,460	ClassNK	–
2024	BEYKIM DENIZCILIK GEMI ISLETMECILIGI SAN. VE TIC. A.S.	30.8	16.7	+84%	1,001 of 1,274	ClassNK	A
2023	not published	32.6	16.2	+101%	1,062 of 1,314	ClassNK	A
2022	not published	42.5	16.1	+165%	1,291 of 1,409	ClassNK	A
2021	not published	41.3	16.7	+147%	1,210 of 1,343	ClassNK	A
2020	not published	41.4	16.2	+156%	1,183 of 1,312	RINA	B
2019	not published	39.6	17.3	+129%	1,156 of 1,321	RINA	B
2018	not published	46.8	17.1	+173%	1,180 of 1,294	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.