Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

MERAKLIS

IMO: 9227819
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 1,669 t
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.40 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NAVEGADORA TRANSPACIFICA SA

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 21 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

99.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14,659

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

10.9 kn

Fuel per day at sea

26.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,130 t

CO₂ emitted

9,776 t

Distance sailed

31,328 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,862 h

119 days, 33% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 97.1 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+18%)

61.0Ranks 2,791 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 4.2 kn · median 10.7 (−61%)

8.8Faster than 0% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 184 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+2,223%)

4.80Ranks 3,589 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU47%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

705 t

7.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MERAKLIS
Bulk carrier median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MERAKLIS
Bulk carrier median

2.55.07.510.012.5

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MERAKLIS
Bulk carrier median

0.050.0100150200

’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−6.1 kn	−0%	−59%	−38%	+1,921%	6.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.6 kn	+7%	−8%	+39%	+35%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+8.1 kn	−27%	+128%	−25%	−41%	8.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−8.0 kn	+34%	−56%	−51%	+75%	8.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 34%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2021	+4.0 kn	−6%	+43%	+60%	−49%	4.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.1 kn	−2%	−30%	−69%	–	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	NAVEGADORA TRANSPACIFICA SA	474	1,494	4,877	1,173	4.2	97.1	184	–
2024	NAVEGADORA TRANSPACIFICA SA	771	2,406	7,929	773	10.3	97.2	9.08	–
2023	not published	521	1,623	5,710	480	11.9	91.2	6.75	–
2022	not published	944	2,978	7,597	1,992	3.8	124	11.4	–
2021	not published	1,446	4,539	15,643	1,326	11.8	92.4	6.54	–
2019	not published	956	2,984	9,762	1,253	7.8	97.9	12.8	–
2018	not published	3,130	9,776	31,328	2,862	10.9	99.9	14,659	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	NAVEGADORA TRANSPACIFICA SA	184	7.90	+2,223%	3,589 of 3,611	EMICERT	A
2024	NAVEGADORA TRANSPACIFICA SA	9.08	8.09	+12%	1,881 of 3,089	EMICERT	A
2023	not published	6.75	8.27	−18%	1,079 of 3,548	EMICERT	A
2022	not published	11.4	8.71	+31%	2,885 of 3,968	EMICERT	A
2021	not published	6.54	8.57	−24%	797 of 3,466	EMICERT	A
2019	not published	12.8	8.38	+53%	2,782 of 3,360	EMICERT	A
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	EMICERT	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.