Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

SEAPEAK HISPANIA

IMO: 9230048
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Santa Cruz De Tenerife
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.51 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel: Mostly LNG
Former names: HISPANIA SPIRIT

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Seapeak Maritime (Glasgow) Ltd · part of Seapeak

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

1,008.6 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

156

g CO₂/m³·nm

Average speed

10.7 kn

Fuel per day at sea

259.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,443 t

CO₂ emitted

32,562 t

32,978 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

11,346 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,059 h

44 days, 12% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2022

Set against all 379 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 356.8 kg/nm · median 252.4 (+41%)

173.5Ranks 321 of 379, lowest first379.8

Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 14.1 (−12%)

10.2Faster than 28% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 13.47 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 10.38 (+30%)

5.96Ranks 270 of 379, lowest first26.44

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU49%
Into the EU3%
At berth in the EU48%

74% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (24,140 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

48.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.013

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SEAPEAK HISPANIA
LNG carrier median

0.010,00020,00030,00040,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

SEAPEAK HISPANIA
LNG carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

SEAPEAK HISPANIA
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	+3.0 kn	−97%	−96%	+1,569%	–	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 97%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−4.7 kn	+10,481%	+6,487%	−98%	–	4.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10,481%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.3 kn	+16%	+5%	+146%	+15%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	−9%	−7%	−65%	−21%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	+11%	+13%	−27%	+27%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−2.4 kn	+2%	−14%	+515%	−4%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024LNG	Seapeak Maritime (Glasgow) Ltd	11,443	32,562	11,346	1,059	10.7	1,008.6	–	–
2023LNG	not published	25,673	70,655	680	88	7.7	37,754.5	–	–
2022LNG	not published	15,117	43,396	42,369	3,412	12.4	356.8	–	–
2021LNG	not published	5,306	14,602	17,257	1,263	13.7	307.5	–	–
2020LNG	not published	16,646	46,097	49,134	3,700	13.3	338.8	–	–
2019LNG	not published	20,594	56,998	67,320	5,181	13.0	305.9	–	–
2018LNG	not published	3,269	9,068	10,948	709	15.4	298.6	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024LNG	Seapeak Maritime (Glasgow) Ltd	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+C
2023LNG	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+C
2022LNG	not published	13.47	10.38	+30%	270 of 379	DNV	A+C
2021LNG	not published	11.68	10.46	+12%	172 of 289	DNV	A+C
2020LNG	not published	14.86	10.71	+39%	217 of 267	DNV	A+C
2019LNG	not published	11.66	10.87	+7%	140 of 248	DNV	A+C
2018LNG	not published	12.17	10.92	+11%	128 of 197	DNV	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.