Navalyze

Navalyze · Reefer · Ship

CARLOS FISCHER

IMO
9230995
Type
Refrigerated cargo carrier
Average cargo carried
12,160 t
Flag (estimated)
Liberia
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency
EEXI 13.69 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Victoria Shipping International Corporation

?
?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 252,170 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
209
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
2.59
g CO₂/t·nm
Average speed
17.9 kn
Fuel per day at sea
89.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
14,879 t
CO₂ emitted
46,487 t
Distance sailed
71,176 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,973 h
166 days, 45% of the year

Within the reefer fleet, 2025

Set against all 109 reefer ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 171 kg/nm · median 82.9 (+107%)
55.8Ranks 109 of 109, lowest first118
Average speedThis ship 15.6 kn · median 14.6 (+7%)
8.2Faster than 71% of reefer ships16.7
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 44.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 56.8 (−22%)
36.7Ranks 25 of 109, lowest first140
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Reefer medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU42%
  • Into the EU56%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
837 t
1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Reefer median is the middle ship of all reefer ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • CARLOS FISCHER
  • Reefer median

Average speed, kn

  • CARLOS FISCHER
  • Reefer median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • CARLOS FISCHER
  • Reefer median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.8 kn+8%+2%+133%+34%0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024−1.3 kn−16%−22%−66%−9%1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023−0.2 kn−3%−4%−45%−1%Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022+0.8 kn+0%+5%−5%−12%0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−0.6 kn−2%−5%+9%–0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020−0.1 kn−0%−1%−32%–Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019−0.1 kn−4%−5%+23%–Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Victoria Shipping International Corporation4,57314,38026,6821,71415.617144.3–
2024Victoria Shipping International Corporation1,8235,72611,43769916.415933.0–
2023not published6,47720,25334,1141,92517.719036.1–
2022not published12,08337,78661,5553,43517.919636.6–
2021not published12,67339,64464,7623,78417.119641.4–
2020not published11,81536,98059,3133,35217.7199––
2019not published17,47054,65687,3144,90917.820038.8–
2018not published14,87946,48771,1763,97317.92092.59–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmReefer medianvs ReeferRankVerifierMethods
2025Victoria Shipping International Corporation44.356.8−22%25 of 109DNVA+B+C
2024Victoria Shipping International Corporation33.058.7−44%8 of 108DNVB+C
2023not published36.155.6−35%15 of 135DNVB+C
2022not published36.655.3−34%20 of 143DNVB+C
2021not published41.455.0−25%31 of 158DNVB+C
2020not published––––DNVB
2019not published38.862.6−38%21 of 147Lloyd's RegisterB
2018not published––––Lloyd's Register–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Reefer ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's reefer ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.