Navalyze

Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

SIKANIA

IMO
9233387
Type
Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried
43,164 t
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency
EIV 5.50 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 43,164 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
92.1 kg/nm
Bulk carrier median 91.2 kg/nm (+1%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
6.71
g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.38 (−20%)
Average speed
9.7 kn
Bulk carrier median 10.3 kn (−6%)
Fuel per day at sea
21.4 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,098 t
CO₂ emitted
3,453 t
Distance sailed
11,921 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,234 h
51 days, 14% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2019

Set against all 3,360 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 92.1 kg/nm · median 91.2 (+1%)
67.0Ranks 1,727 of 3,360, lowest first134.9
Average speedThis ship 9.7 kn · median 10.3 (−6%)
7.4Faster than 36% of bulk carrier ships12.0
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.71 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.38 (−20%)
4.89Ranks 971 of 3,360, lowest first15.46
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports9%
  • From the EU54%
  • Into the EU36%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1.6%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • SIKANIA
  • Bulk carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • SIKANIA
  • Bulk carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • SIKANIA
  • Bulk carrier median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2018→2019−2.1 kn−1%−19%+79%−4%2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2019not published1,0983,45311,9211,2349.792.16.71–
2018not published6201,9426,64656311.893.36.99–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmBulk carrier medianvs Bulk carrierRankVerifierMethods
2019not published6.718.38−20%971 of 3,360ICS Verification ServicesA
2018not published6.998.50−18%1,042 of 3,384EMICERTA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

SIKANIA (IMO 9233387): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2019 | Navalyze