Navalyze

Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

LILA MOMBASA

IMO
9235359
Type
General cargo ship
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency
EEXI 8.09 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
YU CHANG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Kyra Global Marine Services

?
?

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
155.8 kg/nm
General cargo median 58.7 kg/nm (+165%)
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)
76.16
g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 19.25 (+296%)
Average speed
4.0 kn
General cargo median 10.5 kn (−62%)
Fuel per day at sea
14.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,534 t
CO₂ emitted
4,806 t
4,881 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
9,845 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,475 h
103 days, 28% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,111 general cargo ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 155.8 kg/nm · median 58.7 (+165%)
34.9Ranks 1,105 of 1,111, lowest first87.0
Average speedThis ship 4.0 kn · median 10.5 (−62%)
7.8Faster than 1% of general cargo ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 76.16 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 19.25 (+296%)
7.51Ranks 1,085 of 1,111, lowest first39.26
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU30%
  • Into the EU70%
  • At berth in the EU1%

50% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,416 t).

Fuel burned laden
70%
30% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
0.5%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.1 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • LILA MOMBASA
  • General cargo median

Average speed, kn

  • LILA MOMBASA
  • General cargo median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2020→2024−8.6 kn−18%−74%+2,112%–8.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+0.5 kn+34%+40%−91%–0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 34%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2024Kyra Global Marine Services1,5344,8069,8452,4754.0155.8–70%
2020not published852654453512.6190.1205.61–
2019not published7252,2705,11942412.1141.527.69–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nmGeneral cargo medianvs General cargoRankVerifierMethods
2024Kyra Global Marine Services76.1619.25+296%1,085 of 1,111ABSA
2020not published––––ClassNKA
2019not published––––ClassNKA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

LILA MOMBASA (IMO 9235359): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2019–2024 | Navalyze