Navalyze · Container · Ship

MAERSK GIRONDE

IMO: 9235555
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 30,649 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.10 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Anglo-Eastern Ship Management Ltd · part of Anglo-Eastern

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 35,079 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

177

Container median 172 kg/nm (+3%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−10%)

Average speed

15.6 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+11%)

Fuel per day at sea

66.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,175 t

CO₂ emitted

34,917 t

Distance sailed

63,199 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,063 h

169 days, 46% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 174 kg/nm · median 177 (−2%)

78.8Ranks 1,078 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 13.3 (−9%)

9.1Faster than 31% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 17.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+9%)

7.22Ranks 1,203 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports9%
From the EU44%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

11,175 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

772 t

2.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MAERSK GIRONDE
Container median

140.0160.0180.0200.0220.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MAERSK GIRONDE
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MAERSK GIRONDE
Container median

14.016.018.020.022.024.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.3 kn	+19%	+7%	−25%	+15%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.1 kn	−8%	−15%	+269%	−22%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	–	–	–	–	–
2021→2022	–	–	–	–	–
2020→2021	−0.7 kn	+17%	+12%	−68%	+6%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	−4%	−3%	−18%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	−1%	−8%	+154%	−22%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Anglo-Eastern Ship Management Ltd	8,666	27,245	49,912	4,134	12.1	174	17.8	88%
2024	Anglo-Eastern Ship Management Ltd	9,753	30,398	66,723	4,966	13.4	146	15.5	98%
2023	not published	2,882	9,030	18,078	1,250	14.5	159	20.0	98%
2022	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2021	not published	4,226	13,175	20,494	1,379	14.9	206	16.7	95%
2020	not published	11,175	34,917	63,199	4,063	15.6	177	15.8	100%
2019	not published	14,218	44,512	76,830	5,013	15.3	185	17.6	100%
2018	not published	5,667	17,745	30,294	1,843	16.4	187	22.6	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Anglo-Eastern Ship Management Ltd	17.8	16.3	+9%	1,203 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	Anglo-Eastern Ship Management Ltd	15.5	17.5	−11%	851 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	20.0	19.4	+3%	986 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	ABS	C
2021	not published	16.7	17.9	−6%	828 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	15.8	17.6	−10%	778 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	17.6	18.9	−7%	817 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	22.6	20.2	+12%	958 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.