Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

SEAPEAK CATALUNYA

IMO: 9236420
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Santa Cruz De Tenerife
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.61 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel: Mostly LNG
Former names: CATALUNYA SPIRIT

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Seapeak Maritime (Glasgow) Ltd · part of Seapeak

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

452.7 kg/nm

LNG carrier median 204.5 kg/nm (+121%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

24.43

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 7.39 (+231%)

Average speed

11.2 kn

LNG carrier median 14.6 kn (−23%)

Fuel per day at sea

121.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,459 t

CO₂ emitted

45,182 t

45,790 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

34,146 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,044 h

127 days, 35% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 312 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 452.7 kg/nm · median 204.5 (+121%)

147.8Ranks 308 of 312, lowest first328.0

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 14.6 (−23%)

11.0Faster than 11% of LNG carrier ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 24.43 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.39 (+231%)

4.54Ranks 292 of 312, lowest first17.34

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports24%
From the EU49%
Into the EU26%
At berth in the EU1%

62% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (28,155 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

0.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.4 t

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.013

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SEAPEAK CATALUNYA
LNG carrier median

200.0300.0400.0500.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

SEAPEAK CATALUNYA
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

SEAPEAK CATALUNYA
LNG carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	−3.3 kn	+25%	−4%	−25%	+114%	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.5 kn	+4%	+8%	−4%	−22%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−2.3 kn	+6%	−9%	+10%	+23%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.9 kn	+4%	+18%	+128%	+0%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	+3%	+3%	−28%	+46%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024LNG	Seapeak Maritime (Glasgow) Ltd	15,459	45,182	34,146	3,044	11.2	452.7	–	–
2023LNG	not published	16,433	45,536	45,237	3,117	14.5	363.3	–	–
2022LNG	not published	16,495	46,935	47,020	3,366	14.0	350.8	–	–
2021LNG	not published	14,068	39,759	42,691	2,626	16.3	329.5	–	–
2020LNG	not published	5,918	16,393	18,750	1,304	14.4	315.6	–	–
2019LNG	not published	8,038	22,332	26,174	1,832	14.3	307.1	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024LNG	Seapeak Maritime (Glasgow) Ltd	24.43	7.39	+231%	292 of 312	DNV	A+C
2023LNG	not published	11.43	9.10	+26%	252 of 355	DNV	A+C
2022LNG	not published	14.61	10.38	+41%	292 of 379	DNV	A+C
2021LNG	not published	11.90	10.46	+14%	177 of 289	DNV	A+C
2020LNG	not published	11.90	10.71	+11%	167 of 267	DNV	A+C
2019LNG	not published	8.15	10.87	−25%	53 of 248	DNV	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.