Navalyze · Container · Ship

AKHISAR

IMO: 9237149
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 2,335 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 25.40 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SADAN BAYRAKTAR

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: BAYRAKTAR GEMI ISLETMECILIGI VE KIRALAMA A.S

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,335 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

49.7 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−72%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

67.13

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+312%)

Average speed

8.8 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−34%)

Fuel per day at sea

10.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,141 t

CO₂ emitted

6,758 t

6,863 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

43,114 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,910 h

205 days, 56% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 49.7 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−72%)

78.8Ranks 11 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 8.8 kn · median 13.3 (−34%)

9.1Faster than 8% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 67.13 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+312%)

7.22Ranks 2,153 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU43%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU4%

55% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,684 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

AKHISAR
Container median

0.050.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AKHISAR
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AKHISAR
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	−4%	−8%	+12%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.6 kn	+2%	−3%	−2%	–	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.5 kn	+1%	−13%	−0%	−0%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	−12%	−15%	+59%	+0%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	+1%	+6%	−14%	−22%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	+5%	+10%	−4%	+9%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	−6%	−9%	+17%	+7%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	BAYRAKTAR GEMI ISLETMECILIGI VE KIRALAMA A.S	2,141	6,758	43,114	4,910	8.8	49.7	67.13	–
2024	BAYRAKTAR GEMI ISLETMECILIGI VE KIRALAMA A.S	1,992	6,285	38,372	4,203	9.1	51.9	–	–
2023	not published	1,988	6,271	39,149	4,055	9.7	50.8	63.66	–
2022	not published	1,970	6,214	39,256	3,499	11.2	50.2	63.78	–
2021	not published	1,404	4,428	24,633	2,130	11.6	57.0	63.59	–
2020	not published	1,623	5,120	28,757	2,619	11.0	56.4	81.48	–
2019	not published	1,611	5,027	30,073	2,836	10.6	53.6	74.59	–
2018	not published	1,476	4,608	25,757	2,370	10.9	57.3	69.82	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	BAYRAKTAR GEMI ISLETMECILIGI VE KIRALAMA A.S	67.13	16.30	+312%	2,153 of 2,208	ClassNK	–
2024	BAYRAKTAR GEMI ISLETMECILIGI VE KIRALAMA A.S	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A+B
2023	not published	63.66	19.40	+228%	1,808 of 1,899	ClassNK	A
2022	not published	63.78	19.13	+233%	1,739 of 1,825	ClassNK	A
2021	not published	63.59	17.90	+255%	1,701 of 1,781	ClassNK	A
2020	not published	81.48	17.58	+363%	1,779 of 1,797	ClassNK	A
2019	not published	74.59	18.88	+295%	1,731 of 1,788	ClassNK	A
2018	not published	69.82	20.22	+245%	1,623 of 1,705	ClassNK	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.