Navalyze

Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

JAG LATA

IMO
9237618
Type
Oil tanker
Average cargo carried
65,632 t
Port of registry
Mumbai
Technical efficiency
EIV 3.51 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 65,632 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
174.3 kg/nm
Oil tanker median 133.9 kg/nm (+30%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
8.40
g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 9.03 (−7%)
Average speed
11.6 kn
Oil tanker median 11.0 kn (+5%)
Fuel per day at sea
48.4 t/day
Fuel consumed
842 t
CO₂ emitted
2,664 t
Distance sailed
4,832 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
418 h
17 days, 5% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2020

Set against all 1,870 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 174.3 kg/nm · median 133.9 (+30%)
81.5Ranks 1,490 of 1,870, lowest first204.2
Average speedThis ship 11.6 kn · median 11.0 (+5%)
8.1Faster than 69% of oil tanker ships12.5
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.40 g CO₂/t·nm · median 9.03 (−7%)
4.81Ranks 842 of 1,870, lowest first26.30
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU26%
  • Into the EU51%
  • At berth in the EU22%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
22.4%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • JAG LATA
  • Oil tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • JAG LATA
  • Oil tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • JAG LATA
  • Oil tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2019→2020+1.1 kn+19%+31%−79%+41%1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 19%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2020not published8422,6644,83241811.6174.38.40–
2019not published3,35610,46822,9052,17910.5146.55.96–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOil tanker medianvs Oil tankerRankVerifierMethods
2020not published8.409.03−7%842 of 1,870DNVC
2019not published5.968.83−33%418 of 1,919DNVC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

JAG LATA (IMO 9237618): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2019–2020 | Navalyze