Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

TRADER II

IMO: 9238038
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.71 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ODIGITIS GAS CARRIER CORP

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

–

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

–

g CO₂/m³·nm

Average speed

–

Fuel per day at sea

–

Fuel consumed

0 t

CO₂ emitted

0 t

0 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

–

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

0 h

0 days, 0% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 312 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 243.2 kg/nm · median 204.5 (+19%)

147.8Ranks 210 of 312, lowest first328.0

Average speedThis ship 14.4 kn · median 14.6 (−1%)

11.0Faster than 46% of LNG carrier ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 4.99 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.39 (−32%)

4.54Ranks 50 of 312, lowest first17.34

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

The voyage split is not in this year's report.

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

–

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

TRADER II
LNG carrier median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0

’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TRADER II
LNG carrier median

0.05.010.015.0

’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

TRADER II
LNG carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.014.0

’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2023→2024	+9.9 kn	+59%	+408%	−41%	−60%	9.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 59%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	ODIGITIS GAS CARRIER CORP	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024LNG	ODIGITIS GAS CARRIER CORP	4,602	12,699	18,922	1,316	14.4	243.2	–	–
2023	not published	4,909	15,738	32,082	7,153	4.5	153.0	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	ODIGITIS GAS CARRIER CORP	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	A
2024LNG	ODIGITIS GAS CARRIER CORP	4.99	7.39	−32%	50 of 312	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	12.53	9.10	+38%	272 of 355	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.