Navalyze · Reefer · Ship

GREENSEA BERMEO

IMO: 9238703
Type: Refrigerated cargo carrier
Average cargo carried: 1,783 t
Port of registry: Groningen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 21.70 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SALICA FRIGO

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Seatrade Shipmanagement B.V. · part of Seatrade

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,783 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

64.9 kg/nm

Reefer median 82.9 kg/nm (−22%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

115

g CO₂/t·nm · Reefer median 56.80 (+102%)

Average speed

5.6 kn

Reefer median 14.6 kn (−62%)

Fuel per day at sea

8.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,043 t

CO₂ emitted

3,280 t

3,331 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

16,055 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,870 h

120 days, 33% of the year

Within the reefer fleet, 2025

Set against all 109 reefer ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 64.9 kg/nm · median 82.9 (−22%)

55.8Ranks 25 of 109, lowest first117.7

Average speedThis ship 5.6 kn · median 14.6 (−62%)

8.2Faster than 1% of reefer ships16.7

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 114.57 g CO₂/t·nm · median 56.80 (+102%)

36.74Ranks 95 of 109, lowest first140.03

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Reefer medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU38%
Into the EU60%
At berth in the EU2%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,676 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Reefer median is the middle ship of all reefer ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

GREENSEA BERMEO
Reefer median

60.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GREENSEA BERMEO
Reefer median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GREENSEA BERMEO
Reefer median

50.075.0100125150

’182018’192019’202020’212021’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−4.5 kn	−7%	−49%	−11%	−21%	4.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2024	−3.6 kn	+16%	−14%	+224%	–	3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	−49%	−48%	−59%	–	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 49%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.8 kn	+25%	+4%	+1%	−19%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.4 kn	−15%	−1%	−32%	+24%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	+7%	+6%	+232%	−0%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Seatrade Shipmanagement B.V.	1,043	3,280	16,055	2,870	5.6	64.9	114.57	–
2024	Seatrade Shipmanagement B.V.	1,269	3,984	18,116	1,786	10.1	70.0	145.23	–
2022	not published	337	1,050	5,591	409	13.7	60.3	1,125.09	–
2021	not published	1,636	5,178	13,763	1,032	13.3	118.9	110.21	–
2020	not published	1,301	4,117	13,690	851	16.1	95.0	136.02	–
2019	not published	2,249	7,048	20,001	1,461	13.7	112.4	109.38	–
2018	not published	635	1,985	6,019	437	13.8	105.5	109.87	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Reefer median	vs Reefer	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Seatrade Shipmanagement B.V.	114.57	56.80	+102%	95 of 109	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Seatrade Shipmanagement B.V.	145.23	58.69	+147%	102 of 108	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	110.21	54.99	+100%	150 of 158	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	136.02	59.07	+130%	141 of 149	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	109.38	62.58	+75%	129 of 147	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	109.87	72.84	+51%	111 of 136	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Reefer ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's reefer ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.