Navalyze · Reefer · Ship

GREENSEA BERMEO

IMO: 9238703
Type: Refrigerated cargo carrier
Average cargo carried: 1,783 t
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Groningen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 21.70 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SALICA FRIGO

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Seatrade Shipmanagement B.V. · part of Seatrade

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,222 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

112

Reefer median 87.9 kg/nm (+28%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

109

g CO₂/t·nm · Reefer median 62.6 (+75%)

Average speed

13.7 kn

Reefer median 15.2 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

36.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,249 t

CO₂ emitted

7,048 t

Distance sailed

20,001 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,461 h

61 days, 17% of the year

Within the reefer fleet, 2025

Set against all 109 reefer ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 64.9 kg/nm · median 82.9 (−22%)

55.8Ranks 25 of 109, lowest first118

Average speedThis ship 5.6 kn · median 14.6 (−62%)

8.2Faster than 1% of reefer ships16.7

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 115 g CO₂/t·nm · median 56.8 (+102%)

36.7Ranks 95 of 109, lowest first140

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Reefer medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU18%
Into the EU38%
At berth in the EU37%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,622 t

37.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Reefer median is the middle ship of all reefer ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GREENSEA BERMEO
Reefer median

60.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GREENSEA BERMEO
Reefer median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GREENSEA BERMEO
Reefer median

50.075.0100125150

’182018’192019’202020’212021’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−4.5 kn	−7%	−49%	−11%	−21%	4.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2024	−3.6 kn	+16%	−14%	+224%	–	3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	−49%	−48%	−59%	–	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 49%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.8 kn	+25%	+4%	+1%	−19%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.4 kn	−15%	−1%	−32%	+24%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	+7%	+6%	+232%	−0%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Seatrade Shipmanagement B.V.	1,043	3,280	16,055	2,870	5.6	64.9	115	–
2024	Seatrade Shipmanagement B.V.	1,269	3,984	18,116	1,786	10.1	70.0	145	–
2022	not published	337	1,050	5,591	409	13.7	60.3	1,125	–
2021	not published	1,636	5,178	13,763	1,032	13.3	119	110	–
2020	not published	1,301	4,117	13,690	851	16.1	95.0	136	–
2019	not published	2,249	7,048	20,001	1,461	13.7	112	109	–
2018	not published	635	1,985	6,019	437	13.8	106	110	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Reefer median	vs Reefer	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Seatrade Shipmanagement B.V.	115	56.8	+102%	95 of 109	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Seatrade Shipmanagement B.V.	145	58.7	+147%	102 of 108	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	110	55.0	+100%	150 of 158	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	136	59.1	+130%	141 of 149	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	109	62.6	+75%	129 of 147	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	110	72.8	+51%	111 of 136	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Reefer ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's reefer ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.