Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

ZEA HAMBURG

IMO: 9238818
Type: General cargo ship
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EIV 12.81 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

88.4 kg/nm

General cargo median 57.7 kg/nm (+53%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

45.29

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.96 (+81%)

Average speed

11.9 kn

General cargo median 9.7 kn (+23%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,006 t

CO₂ emitted

6,283 t

Distance sailed

22,702 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,901 h

79 days, 22% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2019

Set against all 1,154 general cargo ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 88.4 kg/nm · median 57.7 (+53%)

38.5Ranks 988 of 1,154, lowest first93.7

Average speedThis ship 11.9 kn · median 9.7 (+23%)

6.2Faster than 85% of general cargo ships12.5

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 45.29 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 24.96 (+81%)

11.19Ranks 979 of 1,154, lowest first55.61

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports38%
From the EU29%
Into the EU29%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ZEA HAMBURG
General cargo median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019

Average speed, kn

ZEA HAMBURG
General cargo median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

ZEA HAMBURG
General cargo median

20.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2018→2019	−2.5 kn	−2%	−19%	+171%	+59%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2019	not published	2,006	6,283	22,702	1,901	11.9	88.4	–	–
2018	not published	758	2,376	8,385	581	14.4	90.4	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2019	not published	45.29	24.96	+81%	979 of 1,154	Verifavia	B
2018	not published	28.43	24.89	+14%	632 of 1,044	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.