Navalyze · Combination · Ship

SKS MOSEL

IMO: 9240433
Type: Combination carrier
Average cargo carried: 32,921 t
Technical efficiency: EIV 3.59 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 32,921 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

177.8 kg/nm

Combination median 91.3 kg/nm (+95%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

17.14

g CO₂/t·nm · Combination median 25.96 (−34%)

Average speed

8.0 kn

Combination median 9.7 kn (−18%)

Fuel per day at sea

34.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,979 t

CO₂ emitted

9,452 t

Distance sailed

16,752 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,091 h

87 days, 24% of the year

Within the combination fleet, 2020

Set against all 15 combination ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 177.8 kg/nm · median 91.3 (+95%)

69.2Ranks 14 of 15, lowest first153.9

Average speedThis ship 8.0 kn · median 9.7 (−18%)

7.1Faster than 27% of combination ships13.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 17.14 g CO₂/t·nm · median 25.96 (−34%)

9.22Ranks 5 of 15, lowest first161.18

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Combination medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports42%
From the EU13%
Into the EU36%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

8.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Combination median is the middle ship of all combination ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SKS MOSEL
Combination median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020

Average speed, kn

SKS MOSEL
Combination median

6.07.08.09.010.0

’182018’192019’202020

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SKS MOSEL
Combination median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2019→2020	+1.6 kn	+30%	+63%	−46%	+76%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 30%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.4 kn	−2%	+4%	−30%	−7%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2020	not published	2,979	9,452	16,752	2,091	8.0	177.8	17.14	–
2019	not published	4,251	13,299	31,073	4,863	6.4	136.8	9.75	–
2018	not published	6,216	19,456	44,496	7,386	6.0	139.7	10.46	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Combination median	vs Combination	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2020	not published	17.14	25.96	−34%	5 of 15	Verifavia	C
2019	not published	9.75	67.09	−85%	2 of 10	Verifavia	C
2018	not published	10.46	20.50	−49%	1 of 9	Verifavia	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Combination ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's combination ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.