Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

LNG BAYELSA

IMO: 9241267
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bermuda
Port of registry: Hamilton
Technical efficiency: EIV 9.11 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NLNG Ship Management Ltd

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

283

LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (+23%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

16.1

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (+77%)

Average speed

11.3 kn

LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (−20%)

Fuel per day at sea

77.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

18,695 t

CO₂ emitted

51,939 t

Distance sailed

65,975 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,820 h

243 days, 66% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 312 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 279 kg/nm · median 205 (+37%)

148Ranks 233 of 312, lowest first328

Average speedThis ship 11.1 kn · median 14.6 (−24%)

11.0Faster than 10% of LNG carrier ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 13.4 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.39 (+82%)

4.54Ranks 263 of 312, lowest first17.3

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU59%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

608 t

1.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LNG BAYELSA
LNG carrier median

200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LNG BAYELSA
LNG carrier median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

LNG BAYELSA
LNG carrier median

0.05.010.015.020.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	−1%	−4%	+8%	−17%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	−1.8 kn	−0%	−13%	+233%	+24%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.5 kn	−20%	−10%	−59%	−31%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	+16%	+17%	−35%	+28%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2020	−1.3 kn	−33%	−40%	+11%	+993%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 33%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	NLNG Ship Management Ltd	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024LNG	NLNG Ship Management Ltd	19,845	54,983	71,041	6,403	11.1	279	–	10%
2023LNG / alt.	not published	18,695	51,939	65,975	5,820	11.3	283	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	5,624	15,539	19,840	1,515	13.1	284	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	17,167	47,507	48,505	4,176	11.6	354	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	22,643	62,792	74,427	6,447	11.5	304	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	30,370	87,160	66,796	5,207	12.8	455	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	NLNG Ship Management Ltd	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	C
2024LNG	NLNG Ship Management Ltd	13.4	7.39	+82%	263 of 312	Lloyd's Register	C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	16.1	9.10	+77%	315 of 355	Lloyd's Register	C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	13.0	10.4	+25%	262 of 379	Lloyd's Register	C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	19.0	10.5	+81%	254 of 289	Lloyd's Register	C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	14.8	10.7	+38%	216 of 267	Lloyd's Register	C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	1.35	10.9	−88%	8 of 197	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.