Navalyze · Container · Ship

NAAMA BORCHARD

IMO: 9242558
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,080 t
Flag (estimated): Antigua and Barbuda
Port of registry: St. John`S
Technical efficiency: EEXI 25.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IB
Former names: LAURA ANN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS "F&L Bora" UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,033 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

71.1

Container median 172 kg/nm (−59%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

44.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (+151%)

Average speed

13.2 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,809 t

CO₂ emitted

15,054 t

Distance sailed

67,669 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,116 h

213 days, 58% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 73.5 kg/nm · median 177 (−58%)

78.8Ranks 150 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.3 kn · median 13.3 (+0%)

9.1Faster than 48% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 45.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+177%)

7.22Ranks 1,965 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports84%
From the EU2%
Into the EU10%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

555 t

3.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NAAMA BORCHARD
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NAAMA BORCHARD
Container median

13.013.514.014.5

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NAAMA BORCHARD
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	−9%	−7%	−19%	−8%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	+3%	−0%	−1%	−3%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	−2%	−5%	−4%	+5%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	+2%	−3%	−6%	+5%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.3 kn	+11%	+22%	+33%	+4%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	−6%	−5%	+9%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MS "F&L Bora" UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG	4,835	15,106	65,829	4,968	13.3	73.5	45.2	100%
2024	MS "F&L Bora" UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG	6,514	20,336	80,910	6,212	13.0	80.5	49.0	–
2023	not published	6,393	19,955	81,494	6,057	13.5	78.4	50.7	–
2022	not published	6,787	21,179	84,725	6,135	13.8	80.1	48.4	–
2021	not published	7,084	22,102	89,949	6,192	14.5	78.8	46.0	–
2020	not published	4,809	15,054	67,669	5,116	13.2	71.1	44.2	–
2019	not published	4,706	14,843	62,170	4,755	13.1	75.7	47.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MS "F&L Bora" UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG	45.2	16.3	+177%	1,965 of 2,208	RINA	B
2024	MS "F&L Bora" UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG	49.0	17.5	+180%	1,739 of 1,974	RINA	–
2023	not published	50.7	19.4	+161%	1,690 of 1,899	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	B
2022	not published	48.4	19.1	+153%	1,584 of 1,825	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	46.0	17.9	+157%	1,549 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	44.2	17.6	+151%	1,527 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	47.4	18.9	+151%	1,511 of 1,788	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.