Navalyze · Container · Ship

AMELIE BORCHARD

IMO: 9242560
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,456 t
Port of registry: Saint John'S
Technical efficiency: EEXI 23.47 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: ELBSTRAND

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS "Elbstrand" GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,456 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

83.4 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−53%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

47.73

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+193%)

Average speed

13.7 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

27.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,622 t

CO₂ emitted

20,665 t

20,990 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

79,359 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,772 h

241 days, 66% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 83.4 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−53%)

78.8Ranks 300 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 13.7 kn · median 13.3 (+3%)

9.1Faster than 56% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 47.73 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+193%)

7.22Ranks 1,998 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports70%
From the EU12%
Into the EU17%
At berth in the EU2%

84% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (17,414 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

AMELIE BORCHARD
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AMELIE BORCHARD
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AMELIE BORCHARD
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.7 kn	+5%	+11%	+3%	−11%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	+7%	+4%	−6%	+7%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	−0%	−2%	+8%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	−8%	−14%	−18%	−43%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	+10%	+6%	+15%	+69%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+7.9 kn	−13%	+82%	+64%	+2%	7.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MS "Elbstrand" GmbH & Co. KG	6,622	20,665	79,359	5,772	13.7	83.4	47.73	–
2024	MS "Elbstrand" GmbH & Co. KG	6,103	19,072	76,729	5,925	13.0	79.5	53.78	–
2023	not published	6,076	18,965	81,658	6,114	13.4	74.4	50.45	–
2022	not published	5,654	17,652	75,693	5,585	13.6	74.7	47.89	–
2021	not published	7,488	23,354	92,094	6,373	14.4	81.3	84.51	–
2020	not published	5,940	18,540	80,372	5,372	15.0	73.9	50.02	–
2019	not published	4,180	13,136	49,115	6,890	7.1	85.1	49.22	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MS "Elbstrand" GmbH & Co. KG	47.73	16.30	+193%	1,998 of 2,208	EnvService	B
2024	MS "Elbstrand" GmbH & Co. KG	53.78	17.52	+207%	1,806 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	50.45	19.40	+160%	1,686 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	47.89	19.13	+150%	1,579 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	84.51	17.90	+372%	1,760 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	50.02	17.58	+185%	1,599 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	49.22	18.88	+161%	1,534 of 1,788	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.