Navalyze · Container · Ship

STAR COMET

IMO: 9242596
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 2,294 t
Port of registry: Saint-John'S
Technical efficiency: EEXI 33.36 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: ADW 3. Schifffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,294 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

65.4 kg/nm

Container median 167.2 kg/nm (−61%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

89.44

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.52 (+411%)

Average speed

9.6 kn

Container median 13.5 kn (−29%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,047 t

CO₂ emitted

6,423 t

6,523 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

31,297 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,249 h

135 days, 37% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 65.4 kg/nm · median 167.2 (−61%)

78.9Ranks 59 of 1,974, lowest first301.6

Average speedThis ship 9.6 kn · median 13.5 (−29%)

9.6Faster than 10% of container ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 89.44 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.52 (+411%)

7.33Ranks 1,948 of 1,974, lowest first51.62

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports33%
From the EU36%
Into the EU24%
At berth in the EU7%

70% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,476 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

6.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

STAR COMET
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

STAR COMET
Container median

2.55.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

STAR COMET
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	−2.0 kn	+10%	−8%	−24%	+10%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.0 kn	−16%	−23%	−12%	−5%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	+7%	−2%	−25%	+33%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.9 kn	+1%	+29%	+37%	+19%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+3.3 kn	−8%	+31%	+2%	−6%	3.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+3.0 kn	−3%	+63%	+56%	−2%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	ADW 3. Schifffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG	2,047	6,423	31,297	3,249	9.6	65.4	89.44	–
2023	not published	2,427	7,611	41,020	3,523	11.6	59.2	81.34	–
2022	not published	3,296	10,408	46,558	3,694	12.6	70.8	85.72	–
2021	not published	4,139	13,063	62,359	4,537	13.7	66.4	64.43	–
2020	not published	2,993	9,449	45,445	4,216	10.8	65.8	53.96	–
2019	not published	3,179	9,940	44,371	5,884	7.5	71.7	57.36	–
2018	not published	2,102	6,567	28,514	6,300	4.5	73.7	58.52	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	ADW 3. Schifffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG	89.44	17.52	+411%	1,948 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	81.34	19.40	+319%	1,882 of 1,899	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	85.72	19.13	+348%	1,805 of 1,825	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	64.43	17.90	+260%	1,706 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	53.96	17.58	+207%	1,626 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	57.36	18.88	+204%	1,629 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	58.52	20.22	+189%	1,567 of 1,705	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.