Navalyze · Container · Ship

BOMAR VICTORY

IMO: 9242649
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,338 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EIV 16.74 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,338 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

70.6 kg/nm

Container median 174.4 kg/nm (−60%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

41.25

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.88 (+118%)

Average speed

10.5 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (−23%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,074 t

CO₂ emitted

3,352 t

Distance sailed

15,224 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,446 h

60 days, 17% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2019

Set against all 1,788 container ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 70.6 kg/nm · median 174.4 (−60%)

82.1Ranks 61 of 1,788, lowest first308.8

Average speedThis ship 10.5 kn · median 13.7 (−23%)

8.6Faster than 20% of container ships16.5

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 41.25 g CO₂/t·nm · median 18.88 (+118%)

7.86Ranks 1,439 of 1,788, lowest first55.28

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports33%
From the EU30%
Into the EU26%
At berth in the EU12%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

11.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

BOMAR VICTORY
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019

Average speed, kn

BOMAR VICTORY
Container median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BOMAR VICTORY
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2018→2019	+1.7 kn	−36%	−24%	−69%	+54%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 36%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2019	not published	1,074	3,352	15,224	1,446	10.5	70.6	41.25	–
2018	not published	5,341	16,843	48,690	5,510	8.8	109.7	26.73	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2019	not published	41.25	18.88	+118%	1,439 of 1,788	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	26.73	20.22	+32%	1,095 of 1,705	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.