Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

MORINA THERESA

IMO: 9243382
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 4,114 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.85 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MIRO D, NQ MORINA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Christiania Ship Management · part of Christiania

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,114 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

76.8 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−4%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

59.06

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+293%)

Average speed

10.3 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

18.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,698 t

CO₂ emitted

8,542 t

8,674 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

35,152 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,428 h

143 days, 39% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 76.8 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−4%)

52.8Ranks 644 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 10.3 kn · median 11.1 (−7%)

8.8Faster than 29% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 59.06 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+293%)

7.93Ranks 1,415 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports53%
From the EU26%
Into the EU15%
At berth in the EU6%

80% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,802 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

6.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MORINA THERESA
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MORINA THERESA
Chemical tanker median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MORINA THERESA
Chemical tanker median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.4 kn	−4%	+10%	−23%	+54%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−2.0 kn	+9%	−10%	−9%	+53%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	+1%	−3%	+76%	−47%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.0 kn	−6%	−20%	−40%	+10%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.2 kn	−1%	+8%	+12%	−4%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+3.9 kn	−39%	−10%	−7%	−51%	3.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 39%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.1 kn	+32%	−4%	+173%	+213%	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 32%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Christiania Ship Management	2,698	8,542	35,152	3,428	10.3	76.8	59.06	–
2024	Navquim Ship Management	3,648	11,501	45,569	5,100	8.9	80.0	38.34	–
2023	not published	3,669	11,476	50,029	4,592	10.9	73.3	25.08	–
2022	not published	2,052	6,434	28,374	2,485	11.4	72.3	47.39	–
2021	not published	3,668	11,509	47,439	3,546	13.4	77.3	43.15	–
2020	not published	3,307	10,385	42,186	3,459	12.2	78.4	44.73	–
2019	not published	5,791	18,115	45,312	5,471	8.3	127.8	90.37	–
2018	not published	1,607	5,042	16,600	1,455	11.4	96.8	28.83	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Christiania Ship Management	59.06	15.04	+293%	1,415 of 1,460	DNV	B
2024	Navquim Ship Management	38.34	16.73	+129%	1,103 of 1,274	DNV	B
2023	not published	25.08	16.23	+55%	937 of 1,314	DNV	B
2022	not published	47.39	16.06	+195%	1,327 of 1,409	DNV	B
2021	not published	43.15	16.69	+159%	1,223 of 1,343	RINA	B
2020	not published	44.73	16.16	+177%	1,218 of 1,312	RINA	B
2019	not published	90.37	17.32	+422%	1,312 of 1,321	RINA	B
2018	not published	28.83	17.14	+68%	1,008 of 1,294	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.