Navalyze · Combination · Ship

IBLEA

IMO: 9244441
Type: Combination carrier
Average cargo carried: 12,780 t
Port of registry: Augusta
Technical efficiency: EIV 8.58 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CALISA - CARICHI LIQUIDI SOCIETA ARMATORIALE SPA

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 12,780 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

109.2 kg/nm

Combination median 104.1 kg/nm (+5%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

27.33

g CO₂/t·nm · Combination median 18.14 (+51%)

Average speed

9.5 kn

Combination median 10.5 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,975 t

CO₂ emitted

6,316 t

6,413 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

18,084 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,903 h

79 days, 22% of the year

Within the combination fleet, 2025

Set against all 4 combination ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 109.2 kg/nm · median 104.1 (+5%)

89.1Ranks 4 of 4, lowest first108.5

Average speedThis ship 9.5 kn · median 10.5 (−10%)

9.8Faster than 0% of combination ships11.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 27.33 g CO₂/t·nm · median 18.14 (+51%)

7.22Ranks 4 of 4, lowest first25.66

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Combination medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU45%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU3%

54% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,436 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Combination median is the middle ship of all combination ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

IBLEA
Combination median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

IBLEA
Combination median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

IBLEA
Combination median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	−17%	−17%	+187%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.7 kn	+12%	+21%	−69%	+3%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+1.9 kn	−11%	+13%	−17%	−39%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.3 kn	+2%	−30%	−17%	+87%	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	+10%	+16%	+42%	−11%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+4.4 kn	−22%	+44%	−38%	–	4.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.8 kn	+14%	−16%	+91%	–	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	CALISA - CARICHI LIQUIDI SOCIETA ARMATORIALE SPA	1,975	6,316	18,084	1,903	9.5	109.2	27.33	–
2024	CALISA - CARICHI LIQUIDI SOCIETA ARMATORIALE SPA	825	2,577	6,297	658	9.6	131.0	28.00	–
2023	not published	2,384	7,463	20,396	2,303	8.9	116.9	27.10	–
2022	not published	3,202	10,002	24,490	3,488	7.0	130.7	44.29	–
2021	not published	3,788	11,868	29,569	2,884	10.3	128.1	23.74	–
2020	not published	2,413	7,539	20,752	2,135	9.7	116.3	26.56	–
2019	not published	4,977	15,611	33,432	6,343	5.3	148.8	25,727.69	100%
2018	not published	2,295	7,207	17,512	2,457	7.1	131.0	20.30	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Combination median	vs Combination	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CALISA - CARICHI LIQUIDI SOCIETA ARMATORIALE SPA	27.33	18.14	+51%	4 of 4	RINA	A
2024	CALISA - CARICHI LIQUIDI SOCIETA ARMATORIALE SPA	28.00	21.51	+30%	7 of 9	RINA	A
2023	not published	27.10	24.45	+11%	4 of 5	RINA	A
2022	not published	44.29	13.90	+219%	7 of 7	RINA	A+B
2021	not published	23.74	21.25	+12%	3 of 4	RINA	–
2020	not published	26.56	25.96	+2%	9 of 15	RINA	A+B
2019	not published	–	–	–	–	ABS	–
2018	not published	20.30	20.50	−1%	4 of 9	RINA	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Combination ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's combination ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.