Navalyze · Other · Ship

MPV CLIO

IMO: 9244556
Type: Other ship types
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EIV 12.98 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: ZEA SEOUL, 0310 ZEA SEOUL

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

97.2 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

11.0 kn

Fuel per day at sea

25.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

642 t

CO₂ emitted

2,014 t

Distance sailed

6,609 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

600 h

25 days, 7% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2019

Set against all 1,154 general cargo ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 95.5 kg/nm · median 57.7 (+66%)

38.5Ranks 1,055 of 1,154, lowest first93.7

Average speedThis ship 13.6 kn · median 9.7 (+40%)

6.2Faster than 96% of general cargo ships12.5

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 34.62 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 24.96 (+39%)

11.19Ranks 850 of 1,154, lowest first55.61

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU34%
Into the EU52%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Other median is the middle ship of all other ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MPV CLIO
Other median

40.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’232023

Average speed, kn

MPV CLIO
Other median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’232023

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

MPV CLIO
Other median

22.525.027.530.032.535.0

’182018’192019

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2019→2023	−2.6 kn	+2%	−18%	−69%	–	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	−4%	−9%	−5%	+15%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2023	not published	642	2,014	6,609	600	11.0	97.2	–	–
2019	not published	2,067	6,475	21,640	1,588	13.6	95.5	–	–
2018	not published	2,270	7,115	22,827	1,589	14.4	99.4	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Other median	vs Other	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+B
2019	not published	34.62	24.96	+39%	850 of 1,154	Verifavia	B
2018	not published	30.21	24.89	+21%	681 of 1,044	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Other ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's other ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.