Navalyze

Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

BLUE LAGOON I

IMO
9248447
Type
Oil tanker
Technical efficiency
EEXI 2.28 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
GRENA KNUTSEN
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
222.4 kg/nm
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
–
g CO₂/t·nm
Average speed
8.6 kn
Fuel per day at sea
46.0 t/day
Fuel consumed
462 t
CO₂ emitted
1,479 t
Distance sailed
2,079 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
241 h
10 days, 3% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2022

Set against all 1,961 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 284.4 kg/nm · median 131.1 (+117%)
79.6Ranks 1,939 of 1,961, lowest first192.4
Average speedThis ship 8.2 kn · median 10.9 (−25%)
7.9Faster than 12% of oil tanker ships12.3
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 22.46 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.51 (+164%)
4.85Ranks 1,734 of 1,961, lowest first24.95
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports80%
  • From the EU13%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU7%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
5.8%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • BLUE LAGOON I
  • Oil tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • BLUE LAGOON I
  • Oil tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • BLUE LAGOON I
  • Oil tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2022→2023+0.4 kn−22%−18%−93%–0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022+0.8 kn+8%+20%+5%+7%0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−0.9 kn−1%−11%−26%+24%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+2.2 kn+10%+49%+2%−4%2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+0.6 kn−17%−9%+11%−18%0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2023not published4621,4792,0792418.6222.4––
2022not published9,03728,77731,7803,8548.2284.422.46–
2021not published7,96025,36330,1624,0627.4263.921.08–
2020not published10,80734,37240,7424,9308.3265.317.06–
2019not published9,66230,97540,0316,5916.1241.317.81–
2018not published10,45533,06435,9156,4855.5291.121.81–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOil tanker medianvs Oil tankerRankVerifierMethods
2023not published––––ICS Verification ServicesA
2022not published22.468.51+164%1,734 of 1,961Lloyd's RegisterB
2021not published21.088.86+138%1,546 of 1,789Lloyd's RegisterB
2020not published17.069.03+89%1,502 of 1,870Lloyd's RegisterB
2019not published17.818.83+102%1,589 of 1,919Lloyd's Register–
2018not published21.818.86+146%1,569 of 1,779Lloyd's Register–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

BLUE LAGOON I (IMO 9248447): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2023 | Navalyze