Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

RAGNAR

IMO: 9248825
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 44,397 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEDI 3.55 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CAPE BAXLEY

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 44,397 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

156.2 kg/nm

Oil tanker median 137.8 kg/nm (+13%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.00

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.83 (+25%)

Average speed

11.3 kn

Oil tanker median 9.7 kn (+16%)

Fuel per day at sea

42.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,037 t

CO₂ emitted

12,626 t

Distance sailed

25,853 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,295 h

96 days, 26% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2019

Set against all 1,919 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 156.2 kg/nm · median 137.8 (+13%)

82.4Ranks 1,259 of 1,919, lowest first206.7

Average speedThis ship 11.3 kn · median 9.7 (+16%)

6.1Faster than 75% of oil tanker ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.00 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.83 (+25%)

4.60Ranks 1,265 of 1,919, lowest first24.95

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports17%
From the EU33%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

6.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

RAGNAR
Oil tanker median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0220.0

’182018’192019

Average speed, kn

RAGNAR
Oil tanker median

9.510.010.511.011.5

’182018’192019

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

RAGNAR
Oil tanker median

7.08.09.010.011.0

’182018’192019

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	−26%	−27%	+393%	+50%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2019	not published	4,037	12,626	25,853	2,295	11.3	156.2	11.00	–
2018	not published	1,106	3,459	5,239	459	11.4	211.1	7.32	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2019	not published	11.00	8.83	+25%	1,265 of 1,919	ABS	B
2018	not published	7.32	8.86	−17%	633 of 1,779	ABS	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.