Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

EASLINE GUANGZHOU

IMO
9249594
Type
Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried
12,374 t
Flag (estimated)
Panama
Port of registry
Panama
Technical efficiency
EEXI 7.77 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
TSM DUBHE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TIGER SHIP MANAGEMENT COMPANY LIMITED

?
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,428 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
56.9
Chemical tanker median 85.7 kg/nm (−34%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
32.8
g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.2 (+103%)
Average speed
12.1 kn
Chemical tanker median 11.4 kn (+6%)
Fuel per day at sea
16.6 t/day
Fuel consumed
163 t
CO₂ emitted
510 t
Distance sailed
2,866 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
236 h
10 days, 3% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 70.9 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−11%)
52.8Ranks 517 of 1,460, lowest first111
Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 11.1 (−2%)
8.8Faster than 44% of chemical tanker ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+20%)
7.93Ranks 876 of 1,460, lowest first40.2
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU53%
  • Into the EU41%
  • At berth in the EU6%
Fuel burned laden
77 t
47% of all fuel; 53% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
29 t
5.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • EASLINE GUANGZHOU
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • EASLINE GUANGZHOU
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • EASLINE GUANGZHOU
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2020→2025−1.2 kn+25%+11%+575%−45%1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025TIGER SHIP MANAGEMENT COMPANY LIMITED1,3714,31419,3381,77410.970.918.051%
2020not published1635102,86623612.156.932.847%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025TIGER SHIP MANAGEMENT COMPANY LIMITED18.015.0+20%876 of 1,460Bureau VeritasA
2020not published32.816.2+103%1,088 of 1,312Bureau VeritasA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.