Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

MARITIME JINGAN

IMO: 9251523
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 26,775 t
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EIV 6.95 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 26,775 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

107.1 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 85.7 kg/nm (+25%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.53

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.16 (−22%)

Average speed

12.2 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.4 kn (+7%)

Fuel per day at sea

31.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,370 t

CO₂ emitted

10,552 t

Distance sailed

31,452 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,569 h

107 days, 29% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2020

Set against all 1,312 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 107.1 kg/nm · median 85.7 (+25%)

55.6Ranks 1,065 of 1,312, lowest first119.3

Average speedThis ship 12.2 kn · median 11.4 (+7%)

8.8Faster than 77% of chemical tanker ships12.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.53 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.16 (−22%)

9.32Ranks 373 of 1,312, lowest first41.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports10%
From the EU42%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

97% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

3.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MARITIME JINGAN
Chemical tanker median

80.090.0100.0110.0120.0130.0

’192019’202020

Average speed, kn

MARITIME JINGAN
Chemical tanker median

8.010.012.014.0

’192019’202020

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MARITIME JINGAN
Chemical tanker median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’192019’202020

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2019→2020	+4.2 kn	−12%	+34%	+62%	+19%	4.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2020	not published	3,370	10,552	31,452	2,569	12.2	107.1	12.53	3%
2019	not published	2,363	7,402	19,383	2,416	8.0	121.9	10.55	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2020	not published	12.53	16.16	−22%	373 of 1,312	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	10.55	17.32	−39%	218 of 1,321	Lloyd's Register	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.