Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

SYN ACRAB

IMO: 9251781
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 2,274 t
Port of registry: Napoli
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.16 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Synergas srl

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,274 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

65.8 kg/nm

Gas carrier (LPG) median 81.5 kg/nm (−19%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

92.58

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 35.56 (+160%)

Average speed

11.8 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.6 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

18.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,128 t

CO₂ emitted

6,805 t

6,910 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

32,325 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,740 h

114 days, 31% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 65.8 kg/nm · median 81.5 (−19%)

49.8Ranks 77 of 355, lowest first124.4

Average speedThis ship 11.8 kn · median 12.6 (−6%)

8.8Faster than 36% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 92.58 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.56 (+160%)

14.36Ranks 288 of 355, lowest first120.18

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports74%
From the EU10%
Into the EU4%
At berth in the EU12%

93% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,339 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

12.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SYN ACRAB
Gas carrier (LPG) median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SYN ACRAB
Gas carrier (LPG) median

4.06.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SYN ACRAB
Gas carrier (LPG) median

25.050.075.0100125150

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	+2%	−5%	−4%	−5%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+3.2 kn	−16%	+13%	+7%	−27%	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.5 kn	+12%	−12%	+4%	+29%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.6 kn	−11%	−5%	+16%	+7%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+1%	−2%	+11%	−24%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+5.6 kn	+9%	+113%	−32%	+26%	5.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.1 kn	+16%	−15%	−20%	+12%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Synergas srl	2,128	6,805	32,325	2,740	11.8	65.8	92.58	–
2024	Synergas srl	2,186	6,943	33,765	2,693	12.5	64.8	97.86	–
2023	not published	2,432	7,671	31,499	3,385	9.3	77.2	133.53	–
2022	not published	2,099	6,636	30,404	2,571	11.8	69.0	103.66	–
2021	not published	2,027	6,411	26,185	2,347	11.2	77.4	97.08	–
2020	not published	1,811	5,736	23,623	2,057	11.5	76.7	126.99	–
2019	not published	2,437	7,662	34,679	5,887	5.9	70.3	100.41	–
2018	not published	2,609	8,187	43,099	5,381	8.0	60.5	89.41	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Synergas srl	92.58	35.56	+160%	288 of 355	Bureau Veritas	A+C
2024	Synergas srl	97.86	35.82	+173%	258 of 306	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	133.53	41.77	+220%	301 of 330	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	103.66	42.53	+144%	290 of 348	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	97.08	46.91	+107%	261 of 323	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	126.99	42.29	+200%	300 of 339	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	100.41	45.85	+119%	272 of 331	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	89.41	53.11	+68%	205 of 297	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.