Navalyze · Container · Ship

BF ESPERANZA

IMO: 9252785
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 4,733 t
Port of registry: Saint-John'S
Technical efficiency: EEXI 25.50 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS "Flora" Schifffahrts GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,733 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

90.1 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−49%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

59.70

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+266%)

Average speed

6.1 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−54%)

Fuel per day at sea

13.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

413 t

CO₂ emitted

1,296 t

1,316 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

4,585 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

754 h

31 days, 9% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 90.1 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−49%)

78.8Ranks 404 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 6.1 kn · median 13.3 (−54%)

9.1Faster than 2% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 59.70 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+266%)

7.22Ranks 2,115 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU64%
Into the EU35%
At berth in the EU1%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (656 t).

Fuel burned laden

100%

0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

BF ESPERANZA
Container median

0.050.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BF ESPERANZA
Container median

2.55.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BF ESPERANZA
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	+6%	+3%	−75%	−11%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−4.4 kn	+8%	−36%	+123%	+73%	4.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	−8%	−2%	+32%	−33%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+25%	+25%	−66%	−13%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.2 kn	−12%	−21%	−13%	+59%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	+80%	+72%	−38%	+71%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 80%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+7.5 kn	−54%	+32%	+161%	−71%	7.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 54%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MS "Flora" Schifffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	413	1,296	4,585	754	6.1	90.1	59.70	100%
2024	MS "Flora" Schifffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	1,568	4,888	18,465	2,975	6.2	84.9	67.43	–
2023	not published	649	2,028	8,280	782	10.6	78.4	38.87	–
2022	not published	532	1,682	6,254	625	10.0	85.2	57.84	–
2021	not published	1,258	3,972	18,420	1,848	10.0	68.3	66.43	–
2020	not published	1,631	5,147	21,065	1,889	11.2	77.4	41.77	–
2019	not published	1,460	4,573	34,018	2,932	11.6	42.9	24.49	–
2018	not published	1,209	3,785	13,017	3,195	4.1	92.9	84.75	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MS "Flora" Schifffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	59.70	16.30	+266%	2,115 of 2,208	RINA	B
2024	MS "Flora" Schifffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	67.43	17.52	+285%	1,897 of 1,974	RINA	B
2023	not published	38.87	19.40	+100%	1,525 of 1,899	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	B
2022	not published	57.84	19.13	+202%	1,690 of 1,825	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	66.43	17.90	+271%	1,719 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	41.77	17.58	+138%	1,500 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	24.49	18.88	+30%	1,107 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	84.75	20.22	+319%	1,659 of 1,705	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.