Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC ANSHIKA VI

IMO: 9254848
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 33,385 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.02 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: HYUNDAI CONFIDENCE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 34,043 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

163

Container median 174 kg/nm (−6%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−21%)

Average speed

14.9 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+9%)

Fuel per day at sea

58.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,747 t

CO₂ emitted

17,948 t

Distance sailed

35,218 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,366 h

99 days, 27% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 190 kg/nm · median 177 (+7%)

78.8Ranks 1,210 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.6 kn · median 13.3 (+10%)

9.1Faster than 70% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 17.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+10%)

7.22Ranks 1,214 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU42%
Into the EU52%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

192 t

1.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC ANSHIKA VI
Container median

160.0170.0180.0190.0200.0

’192019’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC ANSHIKA VI
Container median

13.013.514.014.515.0

’192019’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC ANSHIKA VI
Container median

14.015.016.017.018.019.0

’192019’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2019→2025	−0.3 kn	+17%	+14%	+29%	+20%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	8,671	27,278	45,595	3,127	14.6	190	17.9	–
2019	not published	5,747	17,948	35,218	2,366	14.9	163	15.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	17.9	16.3	+10%	1,214 of 2,208	DNV	C
2019	not published	15.0	18.9	−21%	654 of 1,788	Korean Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.