Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

INFINITY AQUILA

IMO: 9258600
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 24,529 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.11 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: AGNES VICTORY, RUI FU TAI

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HONGKUN SHIPPING LIMITED (Foreign Maritime Entity)

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 24,529 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

120.7 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+51%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.43

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+3%)

Average speed

10.0 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

29.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,464 t

CO₂ emitted

7,728 t

7,849 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

20,418 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,041 h

85 days, 23% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 120.7 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+51%)

52.8Ranks 1,387 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 10.0 kn · median 11.1 (−10%)

8.8Faster than 24% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.43 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+3%)

7.93Ranks 756 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU25%
Into the EU58%
At berth in the EU4%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

INFINITY AQUILA
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

INFINITY AQUILA
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

INFINITY AQUILA
Chemical tanker median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.6 kn	+13%	−3%	−33%	+12%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.0 kn	−4%	+6%	+27%	+5%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.9 kn	−7%	+1%	+96%	−21%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	+12%	+1%	−26%	+94%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+0%	−4%	−54%	−20%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.1 kn	+14%	+40%	+21%	+15%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.8 kn	−25%	−6%	+132%	−38%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	HONGKUN SHIPPING LIMITED (Foreign Maritime Entity)	2,464	7,728	20,418	2,041	10.0	120.7	15.43	–
2024	Artemis Shipping Co.,Limited	3,262	10,226	30,429	2,630	11.6	107.2	13.78	–
2023	not published	2,675	8,353	24,039	2,274	10.6	111.3	13.08	–
2022	not published	1,473	4,658	12,291	1,262	9.7	119.8	16.51	–
2021	not published	1,787	5,609	16,648	1,548	10.8	107.4	8.50	–
2020	not published	3,864	12,116	35,970	3,218	11.2	107.4	10.63	–
2019	not published	2,786	8,727	29,616	3,249	9.1	94.1	9.28	–
2018	not published	1,595	5,006	12,789	1,740	7.3	124.7	14.85	11%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	HONGKUN SHIPPING LIMITED (Foreign Maritime Entity)	15.43	15.04	+3%	756 of 1,460	DNV	B+C
2024	Artemis Shipping Co.,Limited	13.78	16.73	−18%	505 of 1,274	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	13.08	16.23	−19%	445 of 1,314	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	16.51	16.06	+3%	731 of 1,409	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	8.50	16.69	−49%	82 of 1,343	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	10.63	9.03	+18%	1,133 of 1,870	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	9.28	8.83	+5%	1,034 of 1,919	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	14.85	17.14	−13%	496 of 1,294	Lloyd's Register	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.