Navalyze

Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

SARA

IMO
9259020
Type
General cargo ship
Port of registry
Malakal Harbor
Technical efficiency
EIV 17.07 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
30.7 kg/nm
General cargo median 57.7 kg/nm (−47%)
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)
32.99
g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.96 (+32%)
Average speed
11.0 kn
General cargo median 9.7 kn (+13%)
Fuel per day at sea
8.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
322 t
CO₂ emitted
1,007 t
Distance sailed
10,471 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
948 h
40 days, 11% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2019

Set against all 1,154 general cargo ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 30.7 kg/nm · median 57.7 (−47%)
38.5Ranks 31 of 1,154, lowest first93.7
Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 9.7 (+13%)
6.2Faster than 71% of general cargo ships12.5
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 32.99 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 24.96 (+32%)
11.19Ranks 827 of 1,154, lowest first55.61
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports13%
  • From the EU48%
  • Into the EU31%
  • At berth in the EU8%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
8.4%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • SARA
  • General cargo median

Average speed, kn

  • SARA
  • General cargo median

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

  • SARA
  • General cargo median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2018→2019+2.5 kn−29%−9%+22%−2%2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 29%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2019not published3221,00710,47194811.030.7––
2018not published3741,1728,5821,0128.543.5––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nmGeneral cargo medianvs General cargoRankVerifierMethods
2019not published32.9924.96+32%827 of 1,154DNVA
2018not published33.5524.89+35%742 of 1,044DNVB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

SARA (IMO 9259020): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2019 | Navalyze