Navalyze · Container · Ship

BURAK BAYRAKTAR

IMO: 9260536
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,669 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: Istanbul
Technical efficiency: EEXI 20.69 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: BAYRAKTAR GEMI ISLETMECILIGI VE KIRALAMA A.S

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,436 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

57.8

Container median 165 kg/nm (−65%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

33.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (+73%)

Average speed

11.0 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (−17%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,502 t

CO₂ emitted

4,744 t

Distance sailed

25,970 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,371 h

99 days, 27% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 62.6 kg/nm · median 177 (−65%)

78.8Ranks 46 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 8.3 kn · median 13.3 (−38%)

9.1Faster than 7% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 35.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+115%)

7.22Ranks 1,791 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports35%
From the EU33%
Into the EU28%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

166 t

3.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BURAK BAYRAKTAR
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BURAK BAYRAKTAR
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BURAK BAYRAKTAR
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.3 kn	−0%	−14%	−60%	–	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.4 kn	+9%	−5%	−9%	–	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	−14%	−8%	+22%	+4%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	−2%	−5%	−43%	−17%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+2.7 kn	−1%	+32%	+228%	−9%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2020	−1.5 kn	+25%	+5%	+153%	+6%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	BAYRAKTAR GEMI ISLETMECILIGI VE KIRALAMA A.S	591	1,876	9,449	1,133	8.3	62.6	35.0	–
2024	BAYRAKTAR GEMI ISLETMECILIGI VE KIRALAMA A.S	1,477	4,664	23,516	2,448	9.6	62.8	–	–
2023	not published	1,502	4,744	25,970	2,371	11.0	57.8	33.6	–
2022	not published	1,431	4,520	21,341	2,066	10.3	67.1	32.4	–
2021	not published	2,550	8,048	37,135	3,510	10.6	68.7	39.1	–
2020	not published	784	2,473	11,322	1,430	7.9	69.2	43.1	–
2018	not published	249	776	4,481	474	9.4	55.5	40.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	BAYRAKTAR GEMI ISLETMECILIGI VE KIRALAMA A.S	35.0	16.3	+115%	1,791 of 2,208	ClassNK	–
2024	BAYRAKTAR GEMI ISLETMECILIGI VE KIRALAMA A.S	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A+B
2023	not published	33.6	19.4	+73%	1,424 of 1,899	ClassNK	A
2022	not published	32.4	19.1	+69%	1,345 of 1,825	ClassNK	A
2021	not published	39.1	17.9	+118%	1,473 of 1,781	ClassNK	A
2020	not published	43.1	17.6	+145%	1,517 of 1,797	ClassNK	A
2018	not published	40.8	20.2	+102%	1,362 of 1,705	ClassNK	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.