Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

LNG ADAMAWA

IMO: 9262211
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bermuda
Port of registry: Hamilton
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.50 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NLNG Ship Management Ltd

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

458

LNG carrier median 323 kg/nm (+42%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

1.87

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.9 (−83%)

Average speed

11.2 kn

LNG carrier median 13.7 kn (−18%)

Fuel per day at sea

123.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

20,157 t

CO₂ emitted

59,360 t

Distance sailed

43,998 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,931 h

164 days, 45% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 325 kg/nm · median 190 (+71%)

152Ranks 351 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 10.2 kn · median 14.4 (−29%)

11.2Faster than 6% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 17.4 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+145%)

5.06Ranks 354 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU65%
Into the EU33%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,039 t

1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LNG ADAMAWA
LNG carrier median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LNG ADAMAWA
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

LNG ADAMAWA
LNG carrier median

0.05.010.015.020.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.1 kn	+18%	+6%	+105%	−12%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	−13%	−5%	−64%	+9%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.4 kn	−7%	−18%	−20%	+8%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	+12%	+2%	+5%	+12%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.9 kn	−4%	+3%	−45%	+11%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2020	+0.8 kn	−31%	−26%	+70%	+621%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 31%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	NLNG Ship Management Ltd	8,362	22,441	25,733	2,523	10.2	325	–	46%
2024LNG	NLNG Ship Management Ltd	3,465	9,595	12,531	1,108	11.3	277	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	10,949	30,330	34,472	3,327	10.4	318	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	14,726	41,010	43,179	3,662	11.8	341	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	12,495	34,614	40,962	3,180	12.9	305	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	23,691	65,527	74,755	6,205	12.0	317	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	20,157	59,360	43,998	3,931	11.2	458	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	NLNG Ship Management Ltd	17.4	7.12	+145%	354 of 386	Lloyd's Register	C
2024LNG	NLNG Ship Management Ltd	19.7	7.39	+167%	289 of 312	Lloyd's Register	C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	18.1	9.10	+99%	321 of 355	Lloyd's Register	C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	16.8	10.4	+62%	314 of 379	Lloyd's Register	C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	15.0	10.5	+43%	230 of 289	Lloyd's Register	C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	13.5	10.7	+26%	197 of 267	Lloyd's Register	C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	1.87	10.9	−83%	9 of 197	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.