Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

LNG CROSS RIVER

IMO: 9262223
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bermuda
Port of registry: Hamilton
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.50 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NLNG Ship Management Ltd

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

359

LNG carrier median 297 kg/nm (+21%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

16.8

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.7 (+57%)

Average speed

11.8 kn

LNG carrier median 14.7 kn (−20%)

Fuel per day at sea

101.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

29,416 t

CO₂ emitted

83,761 t

Distance sailed

81,886 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,940 h

289 days, 79% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 279 kg/nm · median 190 (+47%)

152Ranks 306 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 11.1 kn · median 14.4 (−23%)

11.2Faster than 10% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 13.4 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+88%)

5.06Ranks 334 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU45%
Into the EU53%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,466 t

1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LNG CROSS RIVER
LNG carrier median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LNG CROSS RIVER
LNG carrier median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

LNG CROSS RIVER
LNG carrier median

0.05.010.015.020.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2023→2024	–	–	–	–	–
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	+11%	+4%	+24%	+24%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+2.4 kn	−3%	+22%	+84%	+42%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.1 kn	−22%	−36%	−63%	−36%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2020	−0.8 kn	−22%	−28%	−4%	+1,483%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	NLNG Ship Management Ltd	10,842	29,834	38,816	3,487	11.1	279	–	46%
2024	NLNG Ship Management Ltd	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	20,664	57,265	68,637	6,033	11.4	301	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	14,983	41,669	55,266	4,555	12.1	271	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	8,366	23,354	29,989	3,092	9.7	279	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	29,416	83,761	81,886	6,940	11.8	359	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	39,299	115,540	84,861	6,716	12.6	463	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	NLNG Ship Management Ltd	13.4	7.12	+88%	334 of 386	Lloyd's Register	C
2024	NLNG Ship Management Ltd	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	19.0	9.10	+109%	323 of 355	Lloyd's Register	C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	15.4	10.4	+48%	302 of 379	Lloyd's Register	C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	10.8	10.5	+3%	151 of 289	Lloyd's Register	C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	16.8	10.7	+57%	233 of 267	Lloyd's Register	C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	1.06	10.9	−90%	5 of 197	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.