Navalyze · Container · Ship

BF LETICIA

IMO: 9266542
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 4,567 t
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 25.50 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS "BF LETICIA" Foroohari Schifffahrts GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,567 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

83.7 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−53%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

56.86

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+249%)

Average speed

6.6 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−50%)

Fuel per day at sea

13.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,522 t

CO₂ emitted

4,726 t

4,801 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

18,199 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,754 h

115 days, 31% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 83.7 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−53%)

78.8Ranks 307 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 6.6 kn · median 13.3 (−50%)

9.1Faster than 3% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 56.86 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+249%)

7.22Ranks 2,095 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports29%
From the EU33%
Into the EU36%
At berth in the EU3%

59% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,793 t).

Fuel burned laden

100%

0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

BF LETICIA
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BF LETICIA
Container median

0.05.010.015.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BF LETICIA
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.9 kn	+1%	+41%	+9%	−28%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.7 kn	−6%	+11%	+74%	+23%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−7.3 kn	+6%	−63%	+11%	+57%	7.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.7 kn	+4%	+23%	+167%	−7%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.1 kn	+4%	−15%	−90%	−6%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.4 kn	−6%	+18%	−14%	−6%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MS "BF LETICIA" Foroohari Schifffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	1,522	4,726	18,199	2,754	6.6	83.7	56.86	100%
2024	MS "BF LETICIA" Foroohari Schifffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	1,385	4,339	16,682	3,542	4.7	83.0	79.15	–
2023	not published	846	2,651	9,580	2,380	4.0	88.3	64.20	–
2022	not published	720	2,271	8,630	762	11.3	83.5	40.90	–
2021	not published	258	815	3,228	336	9.6	80.1	44.12	–
2020	not published	2,485	7,841	32,242	2,747	11.7	77.1	46.75	–
2019	not published	3,072	9,599	37,425	4,014	9.3	82.1	49.67	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MS "BF LETICIA" Foroohari Schifffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	56.86	16.30	+249%	2,095 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	MS "BF LETICIA" Foroohari Schifffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	79.15	17.52	+352%	1,935 of 1,974	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2023	not published	64.20	19.40	+231%	1,812 of 1,899	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	40.90	19.13	+114%	1,493 of 1,825	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	44.12	17.90	+146%	1,530 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	46.75	17.58	+166%	1,571 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	49.67	18.88	+163%	1,541 of 1,788	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.