Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

ARCTIC VOYAGER

IMO: 9275335
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.67 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ''K'' Line Energy Shipping (UK) Limited

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

304

LNG carrier median 257 kg/nm (+18%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

15.2

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.5 (+45%)

Average speed

12.1 kn

LNG carrier median 14.6 kn (−17%)

Fuel per day at sea

88.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,515 t

CO₂ emitted

27,185 t

Distance sailed

31,344 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,592 h

108 days, 30% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 505 kg/nm · median 190 (+165%)

152Ranks 382 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 8.5 kn · median 14.4 (−41%)

11.2Faster than 4% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 19.5 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+174%)

5.06Ranks 357 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU38%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,278 t

4.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ARCTIC VOYAGER
LNG carrier median

0.0200.0400.0600.0800.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ARCTIC VOYAGER
LNG carrier median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

ARCTIC VOYAGER
LNG carrier median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.5 kn	+6%	−19%	−21%	+7%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	+4%	+6%	+6%	−25%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	−27%	−29%	+72%	−33%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.0 kn	+107%	+91%	+10%	+139%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 107%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	−28%	−27%	−48%	−27%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.1 kn	+17%	+28%	−23%	+39%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+1.5 kn	+43%	+66%	+3%	+28%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 43%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	''K'' Line Energy Shipping (UK) Limited	24,986	69,944	49,444	5,814	8.5	505	–	–
2024LNG	K Line LNG Shipping UK Ltd.	29,834	76,429	62,441	5,655	11.0	478	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	27,106	77,799	59,168	5,467	10.8	458	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	21,598	63,662	34,351	3,081	11.1	629	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	9,515	27,185	31,344	2,592	12.1	304	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	25,503	73,295	60,818	5,106	11.9	419	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	28,259	81,380	78,511	7,249	10.8	360	–	–
2018	not published	19,258	60,515	76,469	8,187	9.3	252	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	''K'' Line Energy Shipping (UK) Limited	19.5	7.12	+174%	357 of 386	DNV	A+B+C
2024LNG	K Line LNG Shipping UK Ltd.	18.3	7.39	+147%	286 of 312	DNV	A+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	24.2	9.10	+166%	334 of 355	DNV	A+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	36.2	10.4	+249%	354 of 379	DNV	A+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	15.2	10.5	+45%	234 of 289	DNV	A+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	20.7	10.7	+93%	249 of 267	DNV	A+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	14.9	10.9	+37%	196 of 248	DNV	A+C
2018	not published	11.6	10.9	+6%	117 of 197	DNV	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.