Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

DREAM

IMO: 9283899
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 20,704 t
Flag (estimated): Saint Kitts and Nevis
Port of registry: Basseterre
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.76 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: TANAIS DREAM

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Elocin Ltd.

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 16,156 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

71.6

Bulk carrier median 86.5 kg/nm (−17%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.24 (+68%)

Average speed

10.0 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.1 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,094 t

CO₂ emitted

3,423 t

Distance sailed

15,275 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,535 h

64 days, 18% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 75.0 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−9%)

61.0Ranks 1,213 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 10.1 kn · median 10.7 (−6%)

8.8Faster than 30% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+45%)

4.80Ranks 2,860 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports28%
From the EU21%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

247 t

7.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

DREAM
Bulk carrier median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

DREAM
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

DREAM
Bulk carrier median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+3.2 kn	+22%	+77%	+60%	−24%	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−3.8 kn	+8%	−31%	−74%	+6%	3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	−7%	−2%	−5%	+5%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−3%	−8%	−17%	+40%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	−11%	−5%	+40%	−30%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	+25%	+25%	−28%	+8%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−11%	−11%	+17%	−20%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Elocin Ltd.	517	1,633	6,894	685	10.1	75.0	11.4	–
2025	MEDSEA SHIPPING CO	517	1,633	6,894	685	10.1	75.0	11.4	–
2024	Elocin Ltd.	266	832	4,314	625	6.9	61.7	15.1	–
2023	not published	968	3,023	16,893	1,577	10.7	57.3	14.3	–
2022	not published	1,099	3,465	17,831	1,762	10.1	61.6	13.7	–
2021	not published	1,365	4,290	21,382	2,014	10.6	63.8	9.77	–
2020	not published	1,094	3,423	15,275	1,535	10.0	71.6	13.9	–
2019	not published	1,221	3,812	21,226	2,142	9.9	57.5	12.8	–
2018	not published	1,170	3,654	18,139	1,824	9.9	64.5	16.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Elocin Ltd.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	B
2025	MEDSEA SHIPPING CO	11.4	7.90	+45%	2,860 of 3,611	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2024	Elocin Ltd.	15.1	8.09	+87%	2,749 of 3,089	ClassNK	B
2023	not published	14.3	8.27	+73%	3,037 of 3,548	ClassNK	A
2022	not published	13.7	8.71	+57%	3,262 of 3,968	ClassNK	A+B
2021	not published	9.77	8.57	+14%	2,187 of 3,466	ClassNK	A+B
2020	not published	13.9	8.24	+68%	2,778 of 3,150	ClassNK	A+B
2019	not published	12.8	8.38	+53%	2,779 of 3,360	ClassNK	A+B
2018	not published	16.0	8.50	+88%	3,042 of 3,384	ClassNK	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.