Navalyze · Container · Ship

VOHBURG

IMO: 9287807
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 3,755 t
Flag (estimated): Antigua and Barbuda
Port of registry: Saint John'S
Technical efficiency: EIV 36.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Jorg Kopping Dritte Bereedereungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. MS. "Vohburg" KG

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,571 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

67.8

Container median 182 kg/nm (−63%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

46.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+131%)

Average speed

14.8 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+7%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,734 t

CO₂ emitted

21,229 t

Distance sailed

99,241 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,691 h

279 days, 76% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 65.1 kg/nm · median 177 (−63%)

78.8Ranks 64 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.5 kn · median 13.3 (+2%)

9.1Faster than 52% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 54.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+232%)

7.22Ranks 2,067 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports70%
From the EU20%
Into the EU8%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

361 t

1.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

VOHBURG
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

VOHBURG
Container median

12.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

VOHBURG
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.0 kn	−1%	+7%	−17%	−5%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	−4%	−4%	+8%	+10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	+0%	−6%	−12%	−24%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	+3%	−3%	−11%	+6%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+1%	+3%	+4%	+30%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	−0.3 kn	−1%	−3%	−18%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	−2%	−7%	−8%	+8%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Jorg Kopping Dritte Bereedereungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. MS. "Vohburg" KG	3,577	11,161	54,946	4,080	13.5	65.1	54.1	–
2024	Jorg Kopping Dritte Bereedereungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. MS. "Vohburg" KG	4,389	13,687	66,561	5,342	12.5	65.9	57.1	–
2023	not published	4,249	13,548	61,913	4,960	12.5	68.6	51.8	–
2022	not published	4,810	15,413	70,114	5,269	13.3	68.6	68.2	–
2021	not published	5,236	16,787	78,585	5,582	14.1	66.6	64.1	–
2020	not published	4,979	15,870	75,368	5,447	13.8	66.1	49.3	–
2019	not published	6,101	19,283	91,564	6,517	14.1	66.6	50.6	–
2018	not published	6,734	21,229	99,241	6,691	14.8	67.8	46.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Jorg Kopping Dritte Bereedereungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. MS. "Vohburg" KG	54.1	16.3	+232%	2,067 of 2,208	EnvService	B
2024	Jorg Kopping Dritte Bereedereungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. MS. "Vohburg" KG	57.1	17.5	+226%	1,834 of 1,974	EnvService	B
2023	not published	51.8	19.4	+167%	1,705 of 1,899	EnvService	B
2022	not published	68.2	19.1	+256%	1,757 of 1,825	EnvService	B
2021	not published	64.1	17.9	+258%	1,704 of 1,781	EnvService	B
2020	not published	49.3	17.6	+180%	1,589 of 1,797	EnvService	B
2019	not published	50.6	18.9	+168%	1,559 of 1,788	EnvService	B
2018	not published	46.8	20.2	+131%	1,439 of 1,705	EnvService	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.