Navalyze

Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

SEAGRACE

IMO
9290309
Type
Oil tanker
Average cargo carried
42,083 t
Port of registry
Valletta
Technical efficiency
EIV 4.05 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 42,083 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
128.3 kg/nm
Oil tanker median 133.9 kg/nm (−4%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
9.57
g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 9.03 (+6%)
Average speed
8.0 kn
Oil tanker median 11.0 kn (−27%)
Fuel per day at sea
24.7 t/day
Fuel consumed
5,083 t
CO₂ emitted
15,952 t
Distance sailed
39,610 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,943 h
206 days, 56% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2020

Set against all 1,870 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 128.3 kg/nm · median 133.9 (−4%)
81.5Ranks 838 of 1,870, lowest first204.2
Average speedThis ship 8.0 kn · median 11.0 (−27%)
8.1Faster than 9% of oil tanker ships12.5
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.57 g CO₂/t·nm · median 9.03 (+6%)
4.81Ranks 1,000 of 1,870, lowest first26.30
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports17%
  • From the EU32%
  • Into the EU40%
  • At berth in the EU12%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
12.0%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • SEAGRACE
  • Oil tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • SEAGRACE
  • Oil tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • SEAGRACE
  • Oil tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2019→2020−1.2 kn+2%−12%−22%+45%1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019−1.2 kn+11%−1%−15%+16%1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2020not published5,08315,95239,6104,9438.0128.39.57–
2019not published6,38919,94850,5935,4849.2126.36.59–
2018not published6,79321,27759,5975,75410.4114.05.69–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOil tanker medianvs Oil tankerRankVerifierMethods
2020not published9.579.03+6%1,000 of 1,870RINAB+C
2019not published6.598.83−25%533 of 1,919RINAB+C
2018not published5.698.86−36%388 of 1,779RINAB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

SEAGRACE (IMO 9290309): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2020 | Navalyze