Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

TORM KANSAS

IMO: 9290646
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 29,760 t
Port of registry: Copenhagen
Technical efficiency: EIV 6.00 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 29,760 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

87.6 kg/nm

Oil tanker median 131.1 kg/nm (−33%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.26

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.51 (+9%)

Average speed

11.7 kn

Oil tanker median 10.9 kn (+7%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,317 t

CO₂ emitted

4,141 t

Distance sailed

15,027 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,288 h

54 days, 15% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2022

Set against all 1,961 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 87.6 kg/nm · median 131.1 (−33%)

79.6Ranks 284 of 1,961, lowest first192.4

Average speedThis ship 11.7 kn · median 10.9 (+7%)

7.9Faster than 73% of oil tanker ships12.3

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.26 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.51 (+9%)

4.85Ranks 1,098 of 1,961, lowest first24.95

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports24%
From the EU20%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU16%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

16.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

TORM KANSAS
Oil tanker median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022

Average speed, kn

TORM KANSAS
Oil tanker median

9.510.010.511.011.512.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TORM KANSAS
Oil tanker median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’202020’222022

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2020→2022	+0.2 kn	−11%	−10%	−18%	−33%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	–	–	–	–	–
2018→2019	–	–	–	–	–

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2022	not published	1,317	4,141	15,027	1,288	11.7	87.6	9.26	–
2020	not published	1,803	5,713	18,407	1,597	11.5	97.9	13.86	–
2019	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2018	not published	1,327	4,167	15,083	1,405	10.7	88.0	8.82	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2022	not published	9.26	8.51	+9%	1,098 of 1,961	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	13.86	9.03	+53%	1,358 of 1,870	Lloyd's Register	–
2019	not published	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	–
2018	not published	8.82	8.86	−0%	881 of 1,779	Lloyd's Register	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.