Navalyze · Container · Ship

ALIANCA LEBLON

IMO: 9292137
Type: Container ship
Port of registry: Rio De Janeiro
Technical efficiency: EEDI 21.67 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

76.2 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

13.7 kn

Fuel per day at sea

25.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

370 t

CO₂ emitted

1,154 t

Distance sailed

4,851 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

353 h

15 days, 4% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2018

Set against all 1,705 container ships with a full-year 2018 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 73.2 kg/nm · median 181.8 (−60%)

82.0Ranks 90 of 1,705, lowest first312.9

Average speedThis ship 10.6 kn · median 13.8 (−23%)

8.7Faster than 20% of container ships16.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 42.29 g CO₂/t·nm · median 20.22 (+109%)

8.65Ranks 1,384 of 1,705, lowest first54.44

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU55%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

100%

0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ALIANCA LEBLON
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020

Average speed, kn

ALIANCA LEBLON
Container median

10.011.012.013.014.0

’182018’192019’202020

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2019→2020	+1.2 kn	−12%	−4%	+58%	–	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.9 kn	+19%	+40%	−85%	–	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2020	not published	370	1,154	4,851	353	13.7	76.2	–	100%
2019	not published	267	831	3,073	246	12.5	86.8	–	100%
2018	not published	1,474	4,592	20,123	1,903	10.6	73.2	42.29	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	ABS	C
2019	not published	–	–	–	–	ABS	C
2018	not published	42.29	20.22	+109%	1,384 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.